- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 9473] New: Add variant overlay to core
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Sep '23

26 Sep '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9473 Issue ID: 9473 Summary: Add variant overlay to core Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Symas will contribute its variant overlay to OpenLDAP core The variant overlay to slapd allows attributes/values to be shared between several entries. In some ways this is similar to slapo-collect with the exception that the source and target attributes can be different. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10087] New: slapd crashes with core dump Assertion `!LDAP_BACK_CONN_TAINTED( lc )
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Sep '23

18 Sep '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10087 Issue ID: 10087 Summary: slapd crashes with core dump Assertion `!LDAP_BACK_CONN_TAINTED( lc ) Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.15 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: rajko(a)albrecht.jetzt Target Milestone: --- The slapd daemon crashes every ten minutes with slapd: ../../../../../servers/slapd/back-ldap/bind.c:181: ldap_back_conn_delete: Assertion `!LDAP_BACK_CONN_TAINTED( lc )' failed. Aborted (core dumped) I searched around for multiple days but didn't find any solution to this problem. I have the same problem with 2.6.x versions. It is configured to act as caching ldap, while multiple hundred systems contact it. The error message is completely useless for sysadmins because they don't understand what this means for them (as said, asking search engines gives no answers) nor I don't know if - and if so how - I can fix this with configuration. I don't see if this message is talking about the connection to the upstream ldap server or if this is the connection from a client to the caching (and crashing) daemon. First setup was plain on a linux machine, now runnig inside docker environment so the service is restarted after the crash. This is of course not a nice solution. And it looks like the same like #4390 which is marked as "not solved". At least a description what this error messages means would be very helpful incl. how a workaround could look like (increasing timeouts, increase/decrease a socket pool or whatever). Currently the slapd is nearly useless when using it as a caching ldap with high load. Any hints? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10096] New: SIGSEGV in try_read1msg() while using referrals with AD
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Sep '23

18 Sep '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10096 Issue ID: 10096 Summary: SIGSEGV in try_read1msg() while using referrals with AD Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: simon.pichugin(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- The double free happens during a referral chasing with AD. SSSD usage Background (But I think the issue can happen even without SSSD): Referral chasing with AD and Kerberos based GSSAPI/GSS-SPNEGO authentication will never work based in the fact that AD will return domain names instead of the names of AD DC in the referral. That with with 'id_provider = ad' (SSSD setting) there is 'ldap_referrals = false' as default. For 'id_provider = ldap' we expect a generic LDAP server (not AD) which returns proper referrals with fully-qualified hostname or where is simple bind is used, either anonymous or with bind DN and password (which is expected to be the same on all involved LDAP servers and which is not the case with AD since the AD DC from a different domain won't know the given bind DN). So the issue is an unusual one, but still, as it's a crash, I think it deserves a look at. The stack trace for the issue: #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44 #1 0x00007f34182a15b3 in __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at pthread_kill.c:78 #2 0x00007f3418254d46 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26 #3 0x00007f34182287f3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #4 0x00007f3418229130 in __libc_message (fmt=<optimized out>, fmt@entry=0x7f34183bb6bd "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:150 #5 0x00007f34182ab617 in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7f34183be2d0 "double free or corruption (!prev)") at malloc.c:5515 #6 0x00007f34182ad30c in _int_free (av=0x7f34183fac80 <main_arena>, p=0x560fc4b23130, have_lock=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:4458 #7 0x00007f34182af955 in __GI___libc_free (mem=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:3258 #8 0x00007f34173b6f52 in try_read1msg (result=0x7ffea107bb88, lc=0x560fc4ac20e0, all=0, msgid=-1, ld=0x560fc4a77450) at /usr/src/debug/openldap-2.6.2-3.el9.x86_64/openldap-2.6.2/libraries/libldap/result.c:919 #9 wait4msg (result=0x7ffea107bb88, timeout=<optimized out>, all=0, msgid=-1, ld=0x560fc4a77450) at /usr/src/debug/openldap-2.6.2-3.el9.x86_64/openldap-2.6.2/libraries/libldap/result.c:369 #10 ldap_result (ld=0x560fc4a77450, msgid=msgid@entry=-1, all=all@entry=0, timeout=timeout@entry=0x7ffea107bb90, result=result@entry=0x7ffea107bb88) at /usr/src/debug/openldap-2.6.2-3.el9.x86_64/openldap-2.6.2/libraries/libldap/result.c:120 #11 0x00007f3415b6f7be in sdap_process_result (ev=0x560fc49e2420, pvt=<optimized out>) at src/providers/ldap/sdap_async.c:233 #12 0x00007f3418433675 in tevent_common_invoke_fd_handler (fde=fde@entry=0x560fc4b07ce0, flags=1, removed=removed@entry=0x0) at ../../tevent_fd.c:142 #13 0x00007f34184373cf in epoll_event_loop (tvalp=0x7ffea107bc30, epoll_ev=0x560fc49e2700) at ../../tevent_epoll.c:737 #14 epoll_event_loop_once (ev=<optimized out>, location=<optimized out>) at ../../tevent_epoll.c:938 #15 0x00007f341842f6ab in std_event_loop_once (ev=0x560fc49e2420, location=0x7f3418575f10 "src/util/server.c:787") at ../../tevent_standard.c:110 #16 0x00007f3418431b88 in _tevent_loop_once (ev=ev@entry=0x560fc49e2420, location=location@entry=0x7f3418575f10 "src/util/server.c:787") at ../../tevent.c:825 #17 0x00007f3418431c7b in tevent_common_loop_wait (ev=0x560fc49e2420, location=0x7f3418575f10 "src/util/server.c:787") at ../../tevent.c:948 #18 0x00007f341842f71b in std_event_loop_wait (ev=0x560fc49e2420, location=0x7f3418575f10 "src/util/server.c:787") at ../../tevent_standard.c:141 #19 0x00007f3418552237 in server_loop (main_ctx=0x560fc49e2790) at src/util/server.c:787 #20 0x0000560fc371ebda in main (argc=8, argv=<optimized out>) at src/providers/data_provider_be.c:811 (gdb) frame 11 #11 0x00007f3415b6f7be in sdap_process_result (ev=0x560fc49e2420, pvt=<optimized out>) at src/providers/ldap/sdap_async.c:233 233 ret = ldap_result(sh->ldap, LDAP_RES_ANY, 0, &no_timeout, &msg); (gdb) frame 10 #10 ldap_result (ld=0x560fc4a77450, msgid=msgid@entry=-1, all=all@entry=0, timeout=timeout@entry=0x7ffea107bb90, result=result@entry=0x7ffea107bb88) at /usr/src/debug/openldap-2.6.2-3.el9.x86_64/openldap-2.6.2/libraries/libldap/result.c:120 120 rc = wait4msg( ld, msgid, all, timeout, result ); (gdb) frame 9 #9 wait4msg (result=0x7ffea107bb88, timeout=<optimized out>, all=0, msgid=-1, ld=0x560fc4a77450) at /usr/src/debug/openldap-2.6.2-3.el9.x86_64/openldap-2.6.2/libraries/libldap/result.c:369 369 rc = try_read1msg( ld, msgid, all, lc, result ); (gdb) frame 8 #8 0x00007f34173b6f52 in try_read1msg (result=0x7ffea107bb88, lc=0x560fc4ac20e0, all=0, msgid=-1, ld=0x560fc4a77450) at /usr/src/debug/openldap-2.6.2-3.el9.x86_64/openldap-2.6.2/libraries/libldap/result.c:919 919 ldap_return_request( ld, lr, 0 ); (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x00007f34182af955 in __GI___libc_free (mem=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:3258 3258 _int_free (ar_ptr, p, 0); (gdb) frame 6 #6 0x00007f34182ad30c in _int_free (av=0x7f34183fac80 <main_arena>, p=0x560fc4b23130, have_lock=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:4458 4458 malloc_printerr ("double free or corruption (!prev)"); (gdb) frame 8 #8 0x00007f34173b6f52 in try_read1msg (result=0x7ffea107bb88, lc=0x560fc4ac20e0, all=0, msgid=-1, ld=0x560fc4a77450) at /usr/src/debug/openldap-2.6.2-3.el9.x86_64/openldap-2.6.2/libraries/libldap/result.c:919 919 ldap_return_request( ld, lr, 0 ); (gdb) list 914 } 915 } 916 917 if ( lr != NULL ) { 918 if ( lr != &dummy_lr ) { 919 ldap_return_request( ld, lr, 0 ); 920 } 921 lr = NULL; 922 } 923 (gdb) p *ld $6 = {ldc = 0x560fc4b01110, ld_errno = 10, ld_error = 0x0, ld_matched = 0x0, ld_referrals = 0x0} (gdb) p *lr $8 = {lr_msgid = -995099056, lr_status = 22031, lr_refcnt = -995206016, lr_outrefcnt = 22030, lr_abandoned = 0, lr_origid = 40, lr_parentcnt = 4, lr_res_msgtype = 101, lr_res_errno = 0, lr_res_error = 0x0, lr_res_matched = 0x0, lr_ber = 0x0, lr_conn = 0x560fc4ac20e0, lr_dn = {bv_len = 20, bv_val = 0x560fc4affe6b "\304\017V"}, lr_parent = 0x0, lr_child = 0x560fc4adb650, lr_refnext = 0x0, lr_prev = 0x0, lr_next = 0x90} Thank you! Simon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10097] New: slapi didn't build on Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Sep '23

18 Sep '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10097 Issue ID: 10097 Summary: slapi didn't build on Windows Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Apparently no one has ever tried to use SLAPI on Windows, since it has been broken ever since the initial commit in 2002. Fixed now in master, in 3489931553a684ab388b29dde0b8b2cf6cf63e79 and a7bd0416c80bcb954001c1b39512fb97f6c4b4ac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10093] New: Unclear licenses in certain places
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Sep '23

14 Sep '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093 Issue ID: 10093 Summary: Unclear licenses in certain places Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: thegeorg(a)yandex-team.com Target Milestone: --- We use scancode-toolkit in order to perform automatic license analysis. At the time, this toolkit reports certain places with unclear license status. In particular, libraries/libldap/modrdn.c (lines 19 to 24) bear the following notice: ``` /* Copyright 1999, Juan C. Gomez, All rights reserved. * This software is not subject to any license of Silicon Graphics * Inc. or Purdue University. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted * without restriction or fee of any kind as long as this notice * is preserved. */ ``` While copyright notice is completely fine, the second part can not be recognised as any SPDX acknowledged license. Is it possible to unify the text across other parts of OpenLDAP? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10058] New: destroying robust mutexes leads to use of an uninitialized mutex
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Aug '23

27 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10058 Issue ID: 10058 Summary: destroying robust mutexes leads to use of an uninitialized mutex Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jiri.novosad(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 966 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=966&action=edit an example program to reproduce the bug This is a regression introduced in https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9278 . The issue is that mdb_env_setup_locks initializes the mutex only when it gets an exclusive fcntl file lock. But there is this possible order of operations: 1. Process A opens the DB, gets an exclusive file lock, initializes the mutex, downgrades the file lock to shared and does its thing 2. Process A closes the env: it gets an exclusive lock and destroys the mutex 3. Process B opens the DB and blocks in mdb_env_excl_lock trying to get the shared lock 4. Process A finishes closing the env, closes the file descriptor and loses the file lock 5. Process B gets the shared lock, does not initialize the mutex in mdb_env_setup_locks (because it does not have the exclusive lock) 6. Process B tries to lock the mutex, but it is not initialized, pthread_mutex_lock returns EINVAL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 6166] Overlay/backend restructuring
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Aug '23

24 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6166 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=10080 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7226] olcAuditlogFile should be single valued, but accepts multiple values (additional values ignored)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 Aug '23

21 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone|--- |2.7.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7226] olcAuditlogFile should be single valued, but accepts multiple values (additional values ignored)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Aug '23

18 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|olcAuditlogFile At dos not |olcAuditlogFile should be |accept multiple values |single valued, but accepts | |multiple values (additional | |values ignored) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7226] olcAuditlogFile At dos not accept multiple values
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Aug '23

18 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CONFIRMED Resolution|FEEDBACK |--- --- Comment #17 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Root problem of this being treated as single value, but accepting multiple values (additional values are ignored) has never been addressed, which was the original bug report here. The matching rule issue was already fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10090] New: regex that contains a quoted literal space or escaped space results in a parse error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Aug '23

14 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10090 Issue ID: 10090 Summary: regex that contains a quoted literal space or escaped space results in a parse error Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gburd(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Searching ACLs using regex expressions should allow for white space. olcAccess: to dn.subtree="dc=example,dc=com" by dn.regex="ou=Before\ After,o=example[.]com,c=US$" read by * break or olcAccess: to dn.subtree="dc=example,dc=com" by dn.regex="ou=Before[ ]After,o=example[.]com,c=US$" read by * break or any regex that contains a literal space results in a parse error. It seems like the string is broken on literal spaces irrespective of quoting. Debug output from slapd: 64cd845c.253aa590 0x7fe6f4fc9640 slapd: line 0: regular expression "ou=Before\" bad because of Trailing backslash This should also include other methods for expressing white space such as `:space:` or `\w` pattern matches. olcAccess: to dn.subtree="dc=example,dc=com" by dn.regex="ou=Before[[:space:]]After,o=example[.]com,c=US$" read by * break -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10073] New: database monitor | slapd fails to start when "database ldap" without suffix exists
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Aug '23

14 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10073 Issue ID: 10073 Summary: database monitor | slapd fails to start when "database ldap" without suffix exists Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: cyusedfzfb(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- As requested on the mailinglist, I am filing an issue for this behaviour: Today setup the cn=Monitor backend, and after doing so, openldap failed to start with: backend_startup_one (type=monitor, suffix="cn=Monitor"): bi_db_open failed! (-1) The reason turned out to be: we had configured one of our databases ("database ldap") without a suffix. After I added a suffix, openldap started, and cn=Monitor worked as expected. It would be nice if this error message could become a little bit more specific. :-) Also: we've had the "database ldap" without a suffix in production working for many years. Perhaps cn=Monitor should be able to deal with that config as well..? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10088] New: "DN index add failed" when renaming an entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Aug '23

08 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10088 Issue ID: 10088 Summary: "DN index add failed" when renaming an entry Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: git(a)zifbang.com Target Milestone: --- I recently updated a Docker image to the latest Debian release, which means I got a new OpenLDAP version: 2.5.13 (not sure what it was before, but definitely <=2.4.x). The old image's backend was HDB. That disappeared, so I made changes(1) to use the default MDB store. Today I found out that one of my tests is failing against this new image with a "DN index add failed" message. I traced the message down to (2), but I don't understand what is causing the message to be generated and cannot find any documentation on the function that returned the error. Basically, the test is renaming an entry to a very long name. This script shows the error: ```sh #!/usr/bin/env bash set -e function cleanup() { echo "Stopping server..." docker stop ldap-test 2>&1 1>/dev/null } trap cleanup EXIT echo "Starting server..." docker run --rm -d \ -p 1389:389 -p 1636:636 \ --name ldap-test \ ghcr.io/ldapjs/docker-test-openldap/openldap:2023-07-25 2>&1 1>/dev/null echo "Waiting for server to start..." sleep 3 echo "Renaming entry..." docker exec ldap-test \ ldapmodrdn -x -H ldapi:/// \ -D 'cn=admin,dc=planetexpress,dc=com' \ -w 'GoodNewsEveryone' \ -v -d 2 \ 'cn=Turanga Leela,ou=people,dc=planetexpress,dc=com' \ 'cn=a292979f2c86d513d48bbb9786b564b3c5228146e5ba46f404724e322544a7304a2b1049168803a5485e2d57a544c6a0d860af91330acb77e5907a9e601ad1227e80e0dc50abe963b47a004f2c90f570450d0e920d15436fdc771e3bdac0487a9735473ed3a79361d1778d7e53a7fb0e5f01f97a75ef05837d1d5496fc86968ff47fcb64' ``` What changes do I need to make in order to solve this error? I have tried applying the following ldif to my image creation, but it does not solve the problem: ```ldif dn: cn=config changetype: modify replace: oldIndexHash64 olcIndexHash64: TRUE ``` 1: https://github.com/ldapjs/docker-test-openldap/pull/3/files 2: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/2738a32de3a324fc56effd44c… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 15

[Issue 8461] Unable to import LDIF from back-hdb DB to back-mdb db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Aug '23

08 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8461 --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- *** Issue 10088 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8461] Unable to import LDIF from back-hdb DB to back-mdb db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Aug '23

02 Aug '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8461 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |git(a)zifbang.com --- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- *** Issue 10088 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10067] New: back-meta doesn't like an empty modify
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jul '23

31 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10067 Issue ID: 10067 Summary: back-meta doesn't like an empty modify Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- A modify like: dn: <dn> changetype: modify sent to a back-meta DB will trigger an assert on ch_malloc(0). The code also kind of takes liberty at equating free and ch_free, which could backfire under some (extremely rare) circumstances. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10081] New: slapacl lists wrong permissions when peername.ip is used in ACL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jul '23

31 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10081 Issue ID: 10081 Summary: slapacl lists wrong permissions when peername.ip is used in ACL Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: carsten.jaeckel(a)tu-dortmund.de Target Milestone: --- in a testing environment (SLES 15 SP5, OpenLDAP 2.5.14) I use the following ACLs in olcAccess: {0}to dn.exact="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" by dn.exact="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" peername.ip="10.10.10.10" write by * none {1}to * by group.exact="cn=Admins,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar" manage by * none break {2}to * by self read by anonymous auth by * none break If I run ldapmodify -xWD "cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" to change the account cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar on the system with ip 10.10.10.10 everything works as expected. LDAP-Log: 2023-06-16T12:53:12.024030+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 fd=28 ACCEPT from IP=10.10.10.10:53558 (IP=0.0.0.0:636) 2023-06-16T12:53:12.039643+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 fd=28 TLS established tls_ssf=128 ssf=128 tls_proto=TLSv1.3 tls_cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 2023-06-16T12:53:12.039773+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 op=0 BIND dn="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" method=128 2023-06-16T12:53:12.039841+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 op=0 BIND dn="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" mech=SIMPLE bind_ssf=0 ssf=128 2023-06-16T12:53:12.041918+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 qtime=0.000014 etime=0.002242 text= 2023-06-16T12:53:30.488074+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 op=1 MOD dn="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" 2023-06-16T12:53:30.488474+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 op=1 MOD attr=description 2023-06-16T12:53:30.557458+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 op=1 RESULT tag=103 err=0 qtime=0.000022 etime=0.069664 text= 2023-06-16T12:53:33.035486+02:00 tst1 slapd[1333]: conn=1016 fd=28 closed (connection lost) Running the above command from another machine results in a Insufficient access (50) error as also expected. So I assume the ACLs to be working correctly. If I run slapacl -F /etc/symas/etc/openldap/slapd.d -o peername=10.10.10.10 -D cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar -b cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar on the system with ip 10.10.10.10 I get the following output: PROXIED attributeDescription "OU" inserted. PROXIED attributeDescription "DC" inserted. authcDN: "cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" entry: none(=0) children: none(=0) description=test: none(=0) cn=test: none(=0) sn=test: none(=0) objectClass=person: none(=0) objectClass=top: none(=0) structuralObjectClass=person: none(=0) entryUUID=2304877c-4aed-103d-8c25-b91c1e3518c8: none(=0) creatorsName=cn=manager,dc=foo,dc=bar: none(=0) createTimestamp=20230227131940Z: none(=0) userPassword=****: none(=0) pwdChangedTime=20230227131959Z: none(=0) authTimestamp=20230616065542Z: none(=0) pwdLastSuccess=20230616103806Z: none(=0) entryCSN=20230616103806.257186Z#000000#000#000000: none(=0) modifiersName=cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar: none(=0) modifyTimestamp=20230616103806Z: none(=0) I expected to see write access in slapacl's output. If I remove the 'peername.ip="10.10.10.10"' part from olcAccess {0}to dn.exact="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" by dn.exact="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" peername.ip="10.10.10.10" write by * none the above slapacl command outputs write access correctly no matter if the parameter '-o peername=10.10.10.10' is set or not. olcAccess: {0}to dn.exact="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" by dn.exact="cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" write by * none {1}to * by group.exact="cn=Admins,ou=groups,dc=foo,dc=bar" manage by * none break {2}to * by self read by anonymous auth by * none break slapacl -F /etc/symas/etc/openldap/slapd.d -o peername=10.10.10.10 -D cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar -b cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar PROXIED attributeDescription "OU" inserted. PROXIED attributeDescription "DC" inserted. authcDN: "cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar" entry: write(=wrscxd) children: write(=wrscxd) description=first test cn=test: write(=wrscxd) sn=test: write(=wrscxd) objectClass=person: write(=wrscxd) objectClass=top: write(=wrscxd) structuralObjectClass=person: write(=wrscxd) entryUUID=2304877c-4aed-103d-8c25-b91c1e3518c8: write(=wrscxd) creatorsName=cn=manager,dc=foo,dc=bar: write(=wrscxd) createTimestamp=20230227131940Z: write(=wrscxd) userPassword=****: write(=wrscxd) pwdChangedTime=20230227131959Z: write(=wrscxd) authTimestamp=20230616065542Z: write(=wrscxd) pwdLastSuccess=20230616105312Z: write(=wrscxd) entryCSN=20230616105330.487886Z#000000#000#000000: write(=wrscxd) modifiersName=cn=test,ou=users,dc=foo,dc=bar: write(=wrscxd) modifyTimestamp=20230616105330Z: write(=wrscxd) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10047] New: slapd SEGV after slapindex -q
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10047 Issue ID: 10047 Summary: slapd SEGV after slapindex -q Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- In an environment where cn=config is replicated: a) Added an equality index for an existing attribute b) Stopped slapd after the change to the configuration had been replicated to the server. The indexing process that was automatically kicked off by this had been running for ~30 minutes before I stopped slapd c) ran: slapindex -q -F /path/to/config -b <base> <attr> d) started slapd e) segfault To verify it wasn't an overall data issue, I then: a) slapcat the database b) moved the problem database files aside for debugging c) reloaded the database with slapadd -q d) everything works fine I will attach the gdb output to this ticket momentarily -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10042] New: Crash when back-monitor search fails/is abandoned
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10042 Issue ID: 10042 Summary: Crash when back-monitor search fails/is abandoned Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- The fix in ITS#9832 was incomplete, some paths leading to "freeout:" can have passed through monitor_cache_release already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9993] New: Potential race condition in back-mdb online indexer
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9993 Issue ID: 9993 Summary: Potential race condition in back-mdb online indexer Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When the online indexer completes, it should mutex-protect its resetting of the indexing flags. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 10031] New: Conversion of slapd.conf fails using pcache
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10031 Issue ID: 10031 Summary: Conversion of slapd.conf fails using pcache Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)kania-online.de Target Milestone: --- I've got the following working slapd.conf: -------------------- include /opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema include /opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema include /opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/msuser.schema modulepath /opt/symas/lib/openldap moduleload back_ldap moduleload back_mdb moduleload rwm.la moduleload memberof.la moduleload pcache.la loglevel any pidfile /var/symas/run/slapd.pid argsfile /var/symas/run/slapd.args database ldap readonly yes protocol-version 3 rebind-as-user yes uri "ldap://192.168.56.201:389" suffix "dc=example1,dc=net" rootdn "cn=admin,dc=example1,dc=net" idassert-bind bindmethod=simple mode=none binddn="CN=Administrator,cn=users,dc=example1,dc=net" credentials=Passw0rd tls_cacertdir=/opt/symas/etc/openldap tls_reqcert=never idassert-authzFrom "*" overlay rwm rwm-map attribute uid sAMAccountName rwm-map objectClass posixAccount person overlay memberof memberof-group-oc groupOfuniqueNames memberof-member-ad uniquemember memberof-dangling error overlay pcache pcache mdb 100000 6 1000 100 pcachePersist TRUE directory "/var/symas/pcache" pcacheAttrset 0 1.1 pcacheTemplate (uid=) 0 3600 pcacheTemplate (&(|(objectClass=))) 0 3600 pcacheAttrset 1 employeetype givenName cn sn uid mail pcacheTemplate (uid=) 1 3600 pcacheBind (uid=) 1 3600 sub dc=de pcacheAttrset 2 givenName cn sn uid mail uidNumber pcacheTemplate (objectClass=) 2 3600 pcacheAttrset 3 userPassword pcacheTemplate (uid=) 3 3600 pcacheTemplate (objectClass=) 2 3600 pcacheAttrset 4 employeetype givenName cn sn uid mail pcacheTemplate (uid=) 1 3600 pcacheAttrset 5 memberOf pcacheTemplate (objectClass=*) 2 3600 -------------------- Search for an entry in AD is working: ---------------------- root@ldap-proxy01:~/server-setup/proxy# ldapsearch -x -b dc=example1,dc=net cn=administrator -LLL dn dn: cn=Administrator,cn=Users,dc=example1,dc=net ---------------------- Now I want convert it to cn=config but I'm getting the following error: -------------------- root@ldap-proxy01:/opt/symas/etc/openldap# slaptest -F ./my-slapd.d/ -f slapd.conf Entry (olcDatabase={0}mdb,olcOverlay={2}pcache,olcDatabase={1}ldap,cn=config): object class 'olcMdbBkConfig' requires attribute 'olcBackend' config_build_entry: build "olcDatabase={0}mdb" failed: "(null)" config file testing succeeded mdb_opinfo_get: err Permission denied(13) -------------------- When I comment out all the settings for the overlay pcache, converting slapd.conf is working, but starting slapd gives me the following error: -------------- Mär 27 20:02:03 ldap-proxy01 slapd[2042]: olcAttributeTypes: value #741 olcAttributeTypes: Duplicate attributeType: "" Mär 27 20:02:03 ldap-proxy01 slapd[2042]: config error processing cn={5}msuser,cn=schema,cn=config: olcAttributeTypes: Duplicate attributeType: "" Mär 27 20:02:03 ldap-proxy01 slapd[2042]: send_ldap_result: conn=-1 op=0 p=0 Mär 27 20:02:03 ldap-proxy01 slapd[2042]: send_ldap_result: err=80 matched="" text="" -------------- slapcat -n0 tells me: -------------- root@ldap-proxy01:/opt/symas/etc/openldap# slapcat -n0 olcAttributeTypes: value #741 olcAttributeTypes: Duplicate attributeType: "�p�:V" config error processing cn={5}msuser,cn=schema,cn=config: olcAttributeTypes: Duplicate attributeType: "�p�:V" slapcat: bad configuration file! -------------- But switching back to slapd.conf the msuser.schema makes no problems. Creating my own LDIF (without converting): -------------------------- dn: cn=config objectClass: olcGlobal cn: config olcLogLevel: any olcPidFile: /var/symas/run/slapd.pid olcArgsFile: /var/symas/run/slapd.args olcToolThreads: 1 dn: cn=schema,cn=config objectClass: olcSchemaConfig cn: schema dn: cn=module{0},cn=config objectClass: olcModuleList cn: module{0} olcModulePath: /opt/symas/lib/openldap olcModuleLoad: back_mdb olcModuleLoad: back_ldap olcModuleLoad: back_monitor olcModuleLoad: argon2 include: file:///opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/core.ldif include: file:///opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.ldif include: file:///opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/nis.ldif include: file:///opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.ldif include: file:///opt/symas/etc/openldap/schema/msuser.ldif dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcFrontendConfig olcDatabase: {-1}frontend olcSizeLimit: 500 olcAccess: {0}to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage by * break olcAccess: {1}to dn="" by * read olcAccess: {2}to dn.base="cn=subschema" by * read passwordHash: {ARGON2} dn: olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig olcDatabase: {0}config olcRootDN: cn=admin,cn=config olcRootPW: {ARGON2}$argon2i$v=19$m=4096,t=3,p=1$cXdlcnJ0enV6dWlvMTIz$G/l0lynf7ygdz0tG+E7S1fBibsFs/L80AUSisiGl/v4 olcAccess: {0}to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage dn: olcDatabase={1}monitor,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig olcDatabase: {1}monitor olcAccess: {0}to dn.subtree="cn=monitor" by dn.exact=cn=admin,cn=config read by dn.exact=cn=admin,dc=example,dc=net read by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth read dn: olcDatabase={2}ldap,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcLDAPConfig olcDatabase: {2}ldap olcSuffix: dc=example1,dc=net olcAddContentAcl: FALSE olcLastMod: FALSE olcLastBind: FALSE olcLastBindPrecision: 0 olcMaxDerefDepth: 15 olcReadOnly: TRUE olcRootDN: cn=admin,dc=example1,dc=net olcSyncUseSubentry: FALSE olcMonitoring: FALSE olcDbURI: "ldap://dc-net01.example.net:389" olcDbStartTLS: none starttls=no olcDbIDAssertBind: mode=none flags=prescriptive,proxy-authz-non-critical bindm ethod=simple timeout=0 network-timeout=0 binddn="cn=administrator,cn=users,dc =example1,dc=net" credentials="Passw0rd" keepalive=0:0:0 tcp-user-timeout=0 t ls_cacertdir="/opt/symas/etc/openldap" tls_reqcert=never tls_reqsan=allow tls _crlcheck=none olcDbIDAssertAuthzFrom: * olcDbRebindAsUser: TRUE olcDbChaseReferrals: FALSE olcDbTFSupport: no olcDbProxyWhoAmI: FALSE olcDbProtocolVersion: 3 olcDbSingleConn: FALSE olcDbCancel: abandon olcDbUseTemporaryConn: FALSE olcDbConnectionPoolMax: 16 olcDbSessionTrackingRequest: FALSE olcDbNoRefs: FALSE olcDbNoUndefFilter: FALSE olcDbOnErr: continue olcDbKeepalive: 0:0:0 -------------------------- msuser is working, no error about duplicate attributeType. System ist Debian 11 with symas-packages OpenLDAP 2.6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10063] New: Typo in configure.ac for SLAPD_DYNAMIC_PWMODS
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10063 Issue ID: 10063 Summary: Typo in configure.ac for SLAPD_DYNAMIC_PWMODS Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- As noted in -technical discussion: By the way, while looking at the code, I noticed a typo in configure.ac: > if test "$ol_enable_argon2" = "yes" ; then > SLAPD_DYNAMIC_PWMODS="$SLAPD_DYNAMIC_PWDMODS argon2.la" > fi ^^ ^^^ It's referencing two different variables there, which is harmless today, but will be a build bug once multiple password modules become available. SLAPD_DYNAMIC_PWMODS is the correct one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10039] New: configure fails to detect SSL_export_keying_material_early with LibreSSL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10039 Issue ID: 10039 Summary: configure fails to detect SSL_export_keying_material_early with LibreSSL Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: orbea(a)riseup.net Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 957 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=957&action=edit config.log When configuring OpenLDAP using --with-tls=openssl with LibreSSL the configure will fail to detect SSL_export_keying_material_early since LibreSSL doesn't support this function yet. However OpenLDAP doesn't actually use this function so this can be easily solved by checking for SSL_library_init which is a more standard function which both OpenSSL and LibreSSL support which OpenLDAP actually uses in libraries/libldap/tls_o.c. checking openssl/ssl.h usability... yes checking openssl/ssl.h presence... yes checking for openssl/ssl.h... yes checking for SSL_export_keying_material_early in -lssl... no configure: error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package Other than this the build succeeds correctly with at least LibreSSL 3.7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 21

[Issue 9995] New: Potential memory leak in clients/tools/ldapdelete.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 Issue ID: 9995 Summary: Potential memory leak in clients/tools/ldapdelete.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential memory leak in ldapdelete.c line 384.Calling ldap_search_ext_s() without calling ldap_msgfree() to free the memory will cause a memory leak. Doc says "Note that res parameter of ldap_search_ext_s() and ldap_search_s() should be freed with ldap_msgfree() regardless of return value of these functions." in https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ldap_search_ext_s&apropos=0… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10032] New: at_add returns a free'd pointer on error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10032 Issue ID: 10032 Summary: at_add returns a free'd pointer on error Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- When an invalid schema is provided (e.g. the current ./servers/slapd/schema/msuser.schema of memberof/dynlist is loaded already), at_add() hits error handling and frees at->at_oid, but that string is being returned in *err. A fix is coming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9989] New: «make clean» shall not delete libraries/libldap/ldap.pc and libraries/liblber/lber.pc
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9989 Issue ID: 9989 Summary: «make clean» shall not delete libraries/libldap/ldap.pc and libraries/liblber/lber.pc Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org Target Milestone: --- «./configure» and «./config.status» do create ./libraries/libldap/ldap.pc, ./libraries/liblber/lber.pc, while «make clean» deletes both .pc files. «make install» fails, if ./libraries/libldap/ldap.pc or ./libraries/liblber/lber.pc are missing. «./configure && make clean && make depend && make install» is a valid workflow for many other (autoconf/automake based) projects. ./libraries/libldap/ldap.pc and ./libraries/liblber/lber.pc shall be deleted by «make distclean», and kept by «make clean». See also https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html for the idea behind «make clean» vs «make distclean». -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10028] New: crash with pwdMinDelay
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10028 Issue ID: 10028 Summary: crash with pwdMinDelay Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp Target Milestone: --- slapd crash when using pwdMinDelay of ppolicy. The cause is that slap_timestamp() writes to undefined area. It has already been fixed. backtrace: ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f2c70bdbaff in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007f2c70baeea5 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007f2c70baed79 in __assert_fail_base.cold.0 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007f2c70bd4456 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #4 0x0000000000499fdf in entry_schema_check (op=<optimized out>, op@entry=0x7f2c2a9a9ff0, e=<optimized out>, e@entry=0x7f2c20001d30, oldattrs=<optimized out>, oldattrs@entry=0x7f2c20001d30, manage=0, add=add@entry=0, socp=socp@entry=0x7f2c2a9a99d8, text=0x7f2c2a9a9f30, textbuf=0x7f2c2a9a9b40 "", textlen=256) at ../../../servers/slapd/schema_check.c:89 #5 0x00000000004f5dc1 in mdb_modify_internal (op=<optimized out>, op@entry=0x7f2c2a9a9ff0, tid=tid@entry=0x11dc8c0, modlist=<optimized out>, e=<optimized out>, e@entry=0x7f2c2a9a9ac0, text=text@entry=0x7f2c2a9a9f30, textbuf=textbuf@entry=0x7f2c2a9a9b40 "", textlen=256) at ../../../../servers/slapd/back-mdb/modify.c:419 #6 0x00000000004f6cfa in mdb_modify (op=0x7f2c2a9a9ff0, rs=0x7f2c2a9a9f10) at ../../../../servers/slapd/back-mdb/modify.c:714 #7 0x00000000004d5833 in overlay_op_walk (op=0x7f2c2a9a9ff0, rs=0x7f2c2a9a9f10, which=<optimized out>, oi=0xfc1a00, on=0x0) at ../../../servers/slapd/backover.c:706 #8 over_op_func (op=0x7f2c2a9a9ff0, rs=0x7f2c2a9a9f10, which=op_modify) at ../../../servers/slapd/backover.c:766 #9 0x00007f2c6be56a95 in ppolicy_bind_response (op=<optimized out>, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730) at ../../../../servers/slapd/overlays/ppolicy.c:1827 #10 0x0000000000475878 in slap_response_play (op=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730) at ../../../servers/slapd/result.c:567 #11 send_ldap_response (op=op@entry=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=rs@entry=0x7f2c2a9aa730) at ../../../servers/slapd/result.c:642 #12 0x0000000000475f2c in slap_send_ldap_result (op=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730) at ../../../servers/slapd/result.c:918 #13 0x000000000052b6cf in mdb_bind (op=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730) at ../../../../servers/slapd/back-mdb/bind.c:148 #14 0x00000000004d5833 in overlay_op_walk (op=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730, which=<optimized out>, oi=0xfc1a00, on=0x0) at ../../../servers/slapd/backover.c:706 #15 over_op_func (op=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730, which=op_bind) at ../../../servers/slapd/backover.c:766 #16 0x00000000004824f2 in fe_op_bind (op=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730) at ../../../servers/slapd/bind.c:383 #17 0x00000000004822ea in do_bind (op=0x7f2c201039a0, rs=0x7f2c2a9aa730) at ../../../servers/slapd/bind.c:206 #18 0x0000000000466847 in connection_operation (ctx=<optimized out>, ctx@entry=0x7f2c2a9aa9b8, arg_v=arg_v@entry=0x7f2c201039a0) at ../../../servers/slapd/connection.c:1113 #19 0x0000000000465ec1 in connection_read_thread (ctx=<optimized out>, argv=0x11) at ../../../servers/slapd/connection.c:1265 #20 0x00007f2c72d5ea22 in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=<optimized out>) at ../../../libraries/libldap/tpool.c:1053 #21 0x00007f2c70f5b1cf in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #22 0x00007f2c70bc6e73 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9997] New: Potential memory leak in servers/slapd/syncrepl.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9997 Issue ID: 9997 Summary: Potential memory leak in servers/slapd/syncrepl.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential memory leak in syncrepl.c line 605.Calling ldap_search_ext_s() without calling ldap_msgfree() to free the memory will cause a memory leak. Doc says "Note that res parameter of ldap_search_ext_s() and ldap_search_s() should be freed with ldap_msgfree() regardless of return value of these functions." in https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ldap_search_ext_s&apropos=0… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9990] New: Part of the ITS#8698 fix breaks exop overlays that set a callback
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9990 Issue ID: 9990 Summary: Part of the ITS#8698 fix breaks exop overlays that set a callback Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: subbarao(a)computer.org Target Milestone: --- We have a password exop overlay that sets up a callback, which has stopped working when upgrading to 2.5.13. and I tracked it down to a change to servers/slapd/passwd.c implemented as part of the fix for ITS#8698: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/304/diffs?commi… It appears that the intent of this change was to loop through the o_callback list and only remove the cb callback created in this section of the code. But that isn't necessary because the cb callback never gets added to the original list. With this change, line 295 clobbers the original o_callback list which never gets restored -- that's why our exop overlay stopped working. Fortunately, the fix is very simple -- just revert this part of the change. The original code already saved/restored the o_callback list properly. When I reverted this part of the change, our exop overlay resumed working, and the rest of the ITS#8698 functionality (messages from the pwdCheckModule module being returned to the user) also worked as expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 13

[Issue 10035] New: TLSv1.3 cipher suites can be set incorrectly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035 Issue ID: 10035 Summary: TLSv1.3 cipher suites can be set incorrectly Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ipuleston(a)sonicwall.com Target Milestone: --- I noticed that, on the client side, when I use LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_CIPHER_SUITE to set an OpenSSL cipher-suites list that contains a TLSv1.3 cipher suite, that may or may not get set correctly, depending on where it is located in the list. The following is what I am seeing with TLS versions 1.2 and 1.3 enabled: If I set this cipher-suites list: "3DES:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:!eNULL" Then WireShark shows shows it offering these ciphers in the TLS Client Hello, which is correct (the single given TLSv1.3 suite, plus 6 using 3-DES): Cipher Suites (7 suites) Cipher Suite: TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0x1301) Cipher Suite: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0xc008) Cipher Suite: TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0xc012) Cipher Suite: TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0x0016) Cipher Suite: TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0x0013) Cipher Suite: TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0x000a) Cipher Suite: TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV (0x00ff) However, if I set this cipher-suites list: "!eNULL:3DES:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256" Then it now incorrectly offers two additional TLSv1.3 suites: Cipher Suites (9 suites) Cipher Suite: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0x1302) Cipher Suite: TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (0x1303) Cipher Suite: TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0x1301) Cipher Suite: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0xc008) Cipher Suite: TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0xc012) Cipher Suite: TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0x0016) Cipher Suite: TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0x0013) Cipher Suite: TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0x000a) Cipher Suite: TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV (0x00ff) Those first three are all of the TLSv3 ciphers supported by OpenSSL in this system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10003] New: Potential Use After Free in libraries/libldap/open.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10003 Issue ID: 10003 Summary: Potential Use After Free in libraries/libldap/open.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential Use After Free in open.c line 590. Doc says "Once it(ldap_unbind) is called, the connection to the LDAP server is closed, and the ld structure is invalid." in https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ldap_unbind_ext&apropos=0&s… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9998] New: Potential memory leak in tests/progs/slapd-mtread.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 Issue ID: 9998 Summary: Potential memory leak in tests/progs/slapd-mtread.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: test suite Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential memory leak in slapd-mtread.c line 520.Calling ldap_search_ext_s() without calling ldap_msgfree() to free the memory will cause a memory leak. Doc says "Note that res parameter of ldap_search_ext_s() and ldap_search_s() should be freed with ldap_msgfree() regardless of return value of these functions." in https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ldap_search_ext_s&apropos=0… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10048] New: adding a regex entry for overlay variant crashes slapd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10048 Issue ID: 10048 Summary: adding a regex entry for overlay variant crashes slapd Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)kania-online.de Target Milestone: --- I'm using symas-packages 2.6.4 on a Debian 11 system. Two providers with multi provider replication. I try to add different entries wit overlay "variant" first without regex. Here my ldif for the configuration: ----------- dn: cn=module{0},cn=config changetype: modify add: olcModuleLoad olcModuleLoad: variant.la ----------- ----------- dn: olcOverlay={2}variant,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcVariantConfig olcVariantPassReplication: TRUE dn: name=global-addr,olcOverlay={2}variant,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcVariantVariant olcVariantEntry: dc=example,dc=net dn: olcVariantVariantAttribute=postaladdress,name={0}global-addr,olcOverlay={2}variant,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcVariantAttribute olcVariantVariantAttribute: postaladdress olcVariantAlternativeAttribute: postaladdress olcVariantAlternativeEntry: ou=firma,dc=example,dc=net dn: name=company-phone,name={0}global-addr,olcOverlay={2}variant,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcVariantAttribute olcVariantVariantAttribute: telephonenumber olcVariantAlternativeAttribute: mobile olcVariantAlternativeEntry: cn=verw-al,ou=users,ou=verwaltung,ou=firma,dc=example,dc=net ----------- That works as expected. Then I wrote a ldif-file for variant WITH regex: ----------- dn: name=verw-tel,olcOverlay={2}variant,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcVariantRegex olcVariantEntryRegex: cn=.+,ou=users,ou=verwaltung,ou=firma,dc=example,dc=net dn: olcVariantVariantAttribute=telephonNumber,name={1}verw-tel,olcOverlay={2}variant,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcVariantAttributePattern olcVariantVariantAttribute: telephoneNumber olcVariantAlternativeAttribute: telephoneNumber olcVariantAlternativeEntryPattern: ou=Verwaltung,ou=firma,dc=example,dc=net ----------- When I try to add the ldif with ldapadd slapd crashes with the following messages in the log: --------------- May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: conn=1001 fd=20 ACCEPT from PATH=/var/symas/run/ldapi (PATH=/var/symas/run/ldapi) May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: conn=1001 op=0 BIND dn="" method=163 May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: conn=1001 op=0 BIND authcid="gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth" authzid="gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth" May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: conn=1001 op=0 BIND dn="gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth" mech=EXTERNAL bind_ssf=0 ssf=71 May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: conn=1001 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 qtime=0.000009 etime=0.000146 text= May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: conn=1001 op=1 ADD dn="name=verw-tel,olcOverlay={2}variant,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config" May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: slap_get_csn: conn=1001 op=1 generated new csn=20230506081628.055320Z#000000#001#000000 manage=1 May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7f7c64012890 20230506081628.055320Z#000000#001#000000 May 06 08:16:28 provider02 slapd[8018]: olcVariantEntryRegex: value #0: <olcVariantEntryRegex> handler exited with 19! May 06 08:16:28 provider02 systemd[1]: symas-openldap-server.service: Main process exited, code=killed, status=11/SEGV May 06 08:16:28 provider02 systemd[1]: symas-openldap-server.service: Failed with result 'signal'. --------------- Even if olcVariantEntryRegex is wrong (what I don't know up to now) slapd should not crash. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10015] New: Config File KEEPALIVE_IDLE KEEPALIVE_PROBES KEEPALIVE_INTERVAL parser does random memory write
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10015 Issue ID: 10015 Summary: Config File KEEPALIVE_IDLE KEEPALIVE_PROBES KEEPALIVE_INTERVAL parser does random memory write Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sean(a)teletech.com.au Target Milestone: --- In openldap/libraries/libldap/init.c: [master branch] The Config File integers KEEPALIVE_IDLE KEEPALIVE_PROBES KEEPALIVE_INTERVAL Should be struct ol_attribute.type ATTR_OPT_INT rather than ATTR_INT. ATTR_INT interprets struct ol_attribute.offset as a pointer to integer. ATTR_OPT_INT interprets struct ol_attribute.offset as an option number to be passed to ldap_set_option() -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10016] New: syncprov may abandon a psearch improperly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10016 Issue ID: 10016 Summary: syncprov may abandon a psearch improperly Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When processing an Abandon, it may remove the detached search op from the connection while the qtask is actively sending search responses on the connection. If the Abandon is due to an Unbind or connection loss, the connection structure may get reused by a new conn while the qtask is still running. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9953] New: Push replication issue for the pwdHistory attribute
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9953 Issue ID: 9953 Summary: Push replication issue for the pwdHistory attribute Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.57 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dh(a)dotlan.net Target Milestone: --- Hello, I'm using a master ldap instance with a push replication instance to external slaves using the ldap backend on Debian 11 (2.4.57) and I came across some replication issues that forces me to drop the slave dbs and do a manually fullsync everything this error occurs. The problem =========== I know that replication and maintaining a password policy is a complicated task, especially since the ppolicy overlay must be loaded and active in every instance (master, push instance, slave). This problem leads to interesting challanges. First, I encountered a problem where pwdChangedTime would be duplicate because the ppolicy overlay of the push instance and the back_ldap/slave instance would like to set it (which leads to a duplicate attribute error). To fix problem I backported the patch [1] to my local version of the slapd packages. After this problem was fixed, I've encountered the next problematic attribute: "pwdHistory". I've play around with some syncrepl settings, but in the end, it seems to be a similar issue. It looks likes the pwdHistory attribute is not yet present on the slave and both instances (push and slave) try to add the pwdHistory Attributes which leads to a problem where both entries collied (pwdHistory: value #0 already exists). For whatever reason pwdHistory doesn't show up as modified field on the slave in the MOD request. But anyways. Something seems to be wrong, and it could a similar replication issue compared with pwdChangedTime I've lookup into the change history of the ppolicy.c file in the 2.5 and 2.6 branch but couldn't find a newer commit that would address this issue. Does anyone has encountered a similar issue? I've not played around with the 2.5 or 2.6 version, but looking at the code, I've either not seen a fix or the problem might still exist, hopefully I am wrong. Any suggestions? -- best regards Daniel Hoffend [1] https://github.com/openldap/openldap/commit/7a34f46d1cabe8e80937d5167b62152… Setup ===== Host Master - Debian 11 slapd 2.4.57+dfsg-3 - slapd master instance with cn=config - push replikation instance with simple config (syncrepl from localhost, write to backend ldap) Host Slave - Debian 11 slapd 2.4.57+dfsg-3 - Readonly slave On all 3 instances ppolicy is enabled otherwise the operational attributes would be not known/available and sync of locked accounts or per account selected password policy assignment wouldn't work. PUSH Replication Instance ========================= database ldap [...] overlay ppolicy ppolicy_default "cn=default,ou=policies,dc=example,dc=org" syncrepl rid=__RID__ provider=ldap://localhost:389/ binddn="cn=replication,ou=system,dc=example,dc=org" bindmethod=simple credentials="secret" searchbase="dc=example,dc=org" type=refreshAndPersist schemachecking=off retry="5 12 60 +" attrs="*,memberOf,pwdPolicySubentry,pwdChangedTime,pwdAccountLockedTime,pwdHistory,creatorsName,createTimestamp,modifiersName,modifyTimestamp" --- Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_message_to_entry: rid=016 DN: uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org, UUID: db720f56-df0d-103c-8635-9543ccd6e97d Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 LDAP_RES_SEARCH_ENTRY(LDAP_SYNC_ADD) csn=(none) tid a0a89700 Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 be_search (0) Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_null_callback : error code 0x14 Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 be_modify uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org (20) Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 be_modify failed (20) Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: do_syncrepl: rid=016 rc 20 retrying SLAVE LDAP Server ================= database mdb [...] overlay ppolicy ppolicy_default "cn=default,ou=policies,dc=example,dc=org" --- Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176499 op=59513 SRCH base="uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org" scope=0 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176499 op=59513 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1 text= Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176500 op=59513 MOD dn="uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org" Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176500 op=59513 MOD attr=structuralObjectClass creatorsName createTimestamp userPassword pwdChangedTime memberOf entryCSN modifiersName modifyTimestamp Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176500 op=59513 RESULT tag=103 err=20 text=modify/add: pwdHistory: value #0 already exists -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10004] New: Potential memory leak in libraries/librewrite/ldapmap.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10004 Issue ID: 10004 Summary: Potential memory leak in libraries/librewrite/ldapmap.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential memory leak in ldapmap.c line 310, 321.Calling ldap_initialize() without calling ldap_unbind_ext() to free the memory will cause a memory leak. There is no ldap_unbind_ext before calling ldap_initialize in line 376, and the ld will be allocated again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10037] New: Instructions for building argon2.so are inaccurate
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037 Issue ID: 10037 Summary: Instructions for building argon2.so are inaccurate Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sclassen(a)lbl.gov Target Milestone: --- The instructions for building the argon2.so shared library are inaccurate. According to: servers/slapd/pwmods/README.argon2 Building -------- 1) Customize the OPENLDAP variable in Makefile to point to the OpenLDAP source root. For initial testing you might also want to edit DEFS to define SLAPD_ARGON2_DEBUG, which enables logging to stderr (don't leave this on in production, as it prints passwords in cleartext). 2) Run 'make' to produce argon2.so 3) Copy argon2.so somewhere permanent. 4) Edit your slapd.conf (eg. /etc/ldap/slapd.conf), and add: moduleload ...path/to/argon2.so 5) Restart slapd. When I run make from within servers/slapd/pwmods/ I get the following error: [user@machine openldap-2.6.4]# cd servers/slapd/pwmods/ [user@machine pwmods]# make make: *** No rule to make target 'dummyvalue', needed by 'all-common'. Stop. I’m not sure what “dummyvalue” is supposed to be so I commented out line 288 in servers/slapd/pwmods/Makefile # LIBRARY = dummyvalue And get this error: [user@ machine pwmods]# make /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=disable-static --mode=compile cc -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -DSLAPD_IMPORT -c version.c libtool: compile: cc -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -DSLAPD_IMPORT -c version.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/version.o version.c:1:6: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘:’ token usage: mkversion [-c] [-s] [-p package] [-v version] application ^ make: *** [Makefile:310: version.lo] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10033] New: olcDbCacheSize in mdb configuration example
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10033 Issue ID: 10033 Summary: olcDbCacheSize in mdb configuration example Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)kania-online.de Target Milestone: --- on Page: https://openldap.org/doc/admin26/overlays.html#The%20Proxy%20Cache%20Engine There is an example for pcache-db configuration for a mdb-database: ----------- dn: olcDatabase={0}mdb,olcOverlay={0}pcache,olcDatabase={2}ldap,cn=config objectClass: olcMdbConfig objectClass: olcPcacheDatabase olcDatabase: {0}mdb olcDbDirectory: ./testrun/db.2.a olcDbCacheSize: 20 olcDbIndex: objectClass eq olcDbIndex: cn,sn,uid,mail pres,eq,sub ----------- But olcDbCacheSize is an bdb/hdb attribute. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9999] New: Potential memory leak in tests/progs/slapd-search.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9999 Issue ID: 9999 Summary: Potential memory leak in tests/progs/slapd-search.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: test suite Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential memory leak in slapd-search.c line 207.Calling ldap_search_ext_s() without calling ldap_msgfree() to free the memory will cause a memory leak. Doc says "Note that res parameter of ldap_search_ext_s() and ldap_search_s() should be freed with ldap_msgfree() regardless of return value of these functions." in https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ldap_search_ext_s&apropos=0… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10046] New: Wrong ObjectClass Name in example in manpage slapo-variant
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10046 Issue ID: 10046 Summary: Wrong ObjectClass Name in example in manpage slapo-variant Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)kania-online.de Target Milestone: --- Manpage is telling: ---------- # share the Headquarters' address as the company address dn: olcVariantVariantAttribute=postaladdress,name={0}example,olcOverlay={x}variant,$DATABASE objectClass: olcVariantVariantAttribute olcVariantVariantAttribute: postaladdress olcVariantAlternativeAttribute: postaladdress olcVariantAlternativeEntry: ou=Headquarters,dc=example,dc=com ---------- But the name of the ObjectClass is objectClass=olcVariantAttribute -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9996] New: Potential memory leak in libraries/librewrite/ldapmap.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9996 Issue ID: 9996 Summary: Potential memory leak in libraries/librewrite/ldapmap.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential memory leak in ldapmap.c line 359.Calling ldap_search_ext_s() without calling ldap_msgfree() to free the memory will cause a memory leak. Doc says "Note that res parameter of ldap_search_ext_s() and ldap_search_s() should be freed with ldap_msgfree() regardless of return value of these functions." in https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ldap_search_ext_s&apropos=0… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10030] New: Add support for OpenSSL 3.0 to 2.5 stable release
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10030 Issue ID: 10030 Summary: Add support for OpenSSL 3.0 to 2.5 stable release Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- As OpenSSL 1.1.1 is being sunset September 2023 we will need to add OpenSSL 3.0 support to the 2.5 series. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10041] New: unnecessary dynlist evaluation
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10041 Issue ID: 10041 Summary: unnecessary dynlist evaluation Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 963 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=963&action=edit openldap config + data for showing the dynlist usecase Evaluation of member of dynamic groups by dynlist can be slow. However, in some context, the evaluation is not necessary, especially when searching object that are not dynamic groups. You can find attached a configuration and data file showing the use case: - 10000 users - 100 static groups - 5000 dynamic groups, with a filter (&(uid=user*)(objectClass=person), grabbing all users Example of "normal" slow search ~ 115s: ldapsearch -x -H 'ldap://localhost:389/' -D 'uid=admin,ou=people,dc=my-organization,dc=com' -w 'secret' -b 'ou=groups,dc=my-organization,dc=com' '(member=uid=user1,ou=people,dc=my-organization,dc=com)' Example of abnormal slow search ~ 115s: ldapsearch -x -H 'ldap://localhost:389/' -D 'uid=admin,ou=people,dc=my-organization,dc=com' -w 'secret' -b 'ou=groups,dc=my-organization,dc=com' '(&(objectClass=groupOfNames)(member=uid=user1,ou=people,dc=my-organization,dc=com))' Here, the filter about the objectClass could be evaluated first to avoid unnecessary search in dynamic groups. Example of rapid search with DSA IT ~ 1ms: ldapsearch -x -H 'ldap://localhost:389/' -D 'uid=admin,ou=people,dc=my-organization,dc=com' -w 'secret' -b 'ou=groups,dc=my-organization,dc=com' '(&(objectClass=groupOfNames)(member=uid=user1,ou=people,dc=my-organization,dc=com))' -M -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10000] New: Potential memory leak in tests/progs/slapd-watcher.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10000 Issue ID: 10000 Summary: Potential memory leak in tests/progs/slapd-watcher.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: test suite Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1061499390(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Version: Github:master Potential memory leak in slapd-watcher.c line 517.Calling ldap_search_ext_s() without calling ldap_msgfree() to free the memory will cause a memory leak. Doc says "Note that res parameter of ldap_search_ext_s() and ldap_search_s() should be freed with ldap_msgfree() regardless of return value of these functions." in https://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ldap_search_ext_s&apropos=0… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10023] New: Asynchronous connects are broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10023 Issue ID: 10023 Summary: Asynchronous connects are broken Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ipuleston(a)sonicwall.com Target Milestone: --- We have a port of OpenLDAP client running in an embedded system, which is using asynchronous connects to the LDAP server. We have been using OpenLDAP 2.4.40 for a long time, and I just upgraded it to use 2.5.14 (as the current LTS release). After doing this, async connects to the LDAP server no longer work. You can see this in the following debug output: A successful async connect with 2.4.40: ldap_send_initial_request ldap_new_connection 1 1 0 ldap_int_open_connection ldap_connect_to_host: TCP Ian-DC1.sd80.com:389 ldap_pvt_gethostbyname_a: host=Ian-DC1.sd80.com, r=0 ldap_new_socket: 251 ldap_prepare_socket: 251 ldap_connect_to_host: Trying 192.168.168.3:389 ldap_pvt_connect: fd: 251 tm: 10 async: -1 ldap_ndelay_on: 251 attempting to connect: connect errno: 115 ldap_int_poll: fd: -1 tm: 0 A failed async connect with 2.5.14: ldap_send_initial_request ldap_new_connection 1 1 0 ldap_int_open_connection ldap_connect_to_host: TCP Ian-DC1.sd80.com:389 ldap_pvt_gethostbyname_a: host=Ian-DC1.sd80.com, r=0 ldap_new_socket: 247 ldap_prepare_socket: 247 ldap_connect_to_host: Trying 10.21.61.3:389 ldap_pvt_connect: fd: 247 tm: 10 async: -1 ldap_ndelay_on: 247 attempting to connect: connect errno: 115 ldap_open_defconn: successful ldap_send_server_request Sending Bind Request, len=0x6ca10c1f ldap_write: want=63 error=Resource temporarily unavailable Note that in both cases the connect attempt returns errno 115, EINPROGRESS, meaning that it has not completed. But after that: ● 2.4.40 calls ldap_int_poll (via ldap_send_initial_request -> ldap_int_check_async_open) to begin the wait for async completion. ● 2.5.14 instead reports a successful connect, and tries to send the bind which fails since thre socket is not yet connected. I tracked the problem down to a change made for ITS #8022 "an async connect may still succeed immediately" in this commit: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/commit/ae6347bac12bbf843678a83… That change in ldap_new_connection makes it set lconn_status for an async connect to LDAP_CONNST_CONNECTED rather than LDAP_CONNST_CONNECTING if ldap_int_open_connection returns 0. The problem is that ldap_int_open_connection returns 0 after getting the EINPROGRESS. ldap_connect_to_host returns -2 for the latter, but ldap_int_open_connection doesn't check for that, returning 0 for any return code other than -1. I think that the bug is actually in ldap_int_open_connection rather than in the above commit. It should probably return -2 when ldap_connect_to_host returns that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 18

[Issue 10011] New: Incompatibilities with stricter C99 compilers
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011 Issue ID: 10011 Summary: Incompatibilities with stricter C99 compilers Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sam(a)gentoo.org Target Milestone: --- Newer C compilers (>= Clang 16 and likely >= GCC 14) reject some constructs removed in C99 like implicit function declarations and implicit ints. Some compilers are also starting to reject obsolete K&R prototypes which were removed in C23. I've filed an MR at https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/605 to address the issues in configure as well as a small number of issues in the codebase itself. For more information, see LWN.net [0] or LLVM's Discourse [1], the Gentoo wiki [2], or the (new) c-std-porting mailing list [3]. [0] https://lwn.net/Articles/913505/ [1] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/configure-script-breakage-with-the-new-werror-… [2] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Modern_C_porting [3] hosted at lists.linux.dev. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10079] New: Facing syncrepl issue after selecting filter and attrs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10079 Issue ID: 10079 Summary: Facing syncrepl issue after selecting filter and attrs Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.49 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ramprasad.sharma(a)orange.com Target Milestone: --- I'm facing an issue, when I'm using replication without filter and attrs, it works fine but when I try it with filter and attrs , I get nentries=0 and replication dont happen.. what could be the possible issue, I tried many thing.. syncrepl rid=<%= @%> provider=ldaps://master.<%= @%>h:636/ bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=replication,dc=di-diod,dc=tech" credentials=<%= @%> searchbase="ou=people,dc=di-diod,dc=tech" filter="(objectClass=posixAccount)" attrs="cn,uid,x1sshPubKey,x2sshPubKey,uidNumber,gidNumber,homeDirectory,gecos,loginShell,description,sshPublicKey" scope=sub schemachecking=on type=refreshOnly interval=00:00:00:01 retry="30 5 300 3" I can use any help on call also.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10078] New: segfault error 4 in in dynlist-2.5.so.0.1.8
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10078 Issue ID: 10078 Summary: segfault error 4 in in dynlist-2.5.so.0.1.8 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gustav(a)spllg.de Target Milestone: --- whenever i execute an ldapsearch, slapd crashes and i find the following lines in /var/log/syslog segfault at 0 ip 00007f876bece9c1 sp 00007f876a1fc0c0 error 4 in dynlist-2.5.so.0.1.8[7f876becb000+6000] likely on CPU 0 (core 0, socket 0) Code: 48 29 d0 48 89 d7 48 89 c1 31 c0 83 c1 6c c1 e9 03 f3 48 ab 48 8b 84 24 10 02 00 00 4c 89 ef c7 84 24 a0 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 <48> 8b 00 ff 50 78 44 39 73 64 74 09 45 84 e4 0f 85 22 03 00 00 48 Stopping OpenLDAP: slapd. slapd.service: Deactivated successfully. the database had been imported from ldap-2.4.57 where ldap runs fine. is there anything i can do to fix the problem? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10075] New: back-sql regression between 2.4.40 and 2.4.44
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Jun '23

28 Jun '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10075 Issue ID: 10075 Summary: back-sql regression between 2.4.40 and 2.4.44 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.44 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: daniel.walker(a)ncas.ac.uk Target Milestone: --- I have just upgraded from CentOS6 to CentOS7 ( I know, not my pick :). On OpenLdap back-sql 2.4.40 on CentOS6, this seems to be honoured: "Multiple attributeType definitions are allowed for an entry; that is, multiple ldap_attr_mappings rows can refer to the same ldap_oc_mappings row with the same name; the resulting attribute values are honored for multivalued attributes in search filters, in search results, in compare AVAs. However, only rules according to the first instance of that attributeType are followed in add, modify and delete operations. This limitation, under certain circumstances, may be removed in the future." (from https://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/978.html ) I was using this feature to get memberAddress attributes from two separate tables in my SQL (internal people and external people) Upon upgrading to 2.4.44 on CentOS7, the second entry is no longer honoured. Relevant entries: MariaDB [ncas_database]> SELECT name,sel_expr,from_tbls,join_where,add_proc,delete_proc,param_order,expect_return,sel_expr_u FROM ldap_attr_mappings WHERE oc_map_id=4 AND name='memberAddress'; +---------------+--------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------------+ | name | sel_expr | from_tbls | join_where | add_proc | delete_proc | param_order | expect_return | sel_expr_u | +---------------+--------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------------+ | memberAddress | CONCAT(emails.address,"@domain.name") | groups,people_groups AS ps,people,emails | groups.id=ps.group_id AND ps.person_id=people.id AND people.id=emails.person_id AND emails.main=1 AND (people.contract_end > NOW() OR people.contract_end IS NULL) | NULL | NULL | 3 | 0 | NULL | | memberAddress | email | groups,external_members | groups.id=external_members.group_id | NULL | NULL | 3 | 0 | NULL | +---------------+--------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+-------------+-------------+---------------+------------+ 2 rows in set (0.000 sec) The second one is ignored; no requests to the external_members table show in the logs. Is this a known bug? I did look through the archives, but I wasn't able to find it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs