Re: (ITS#4868) Binary Attribute Patch(es)
by hyc@symas.com
vargok(a)yahoo.com wrote:
> (I realize this is ridiculously late, but... well, better late than never,
and this is the first I've gotten back to it.)
>
> Yes! It's working now in 2.4.x as expected, via the new userCertificate
> stub
data provided by example. FWIW, it appears to be working fine with the
PostgreSQL example files as well.
>
> Unfortunately, it was never "back" ported to 2.3. We're currently using
2.3.43 as part of RHEL-5. Any chance it could get back-ported into the 2.3 branch?
Development on 2.3 ended about a year ago.
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Pierangelo Masarati<ando(a)sys-net.it>
>> To: vargok(a)yahoo.com
>> Cc: openldap-its(a)openldap.org
>> Sent: Wed, April 11, 2007 7:06:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: (ITS#4868) Binary Attribute Patch(es)
>>
>> ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
>>
>>> Right. Time permitting, I'll check why back-sql behaves differently
>>> and, in case, how to fix it.
>>
>> HEAD should be working as expected, now. I've also updated mysql and
>> psql sql-test000 (the latter is untested, though).
>>
>> Please test and report. p.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
>> OpenLDAP Core Team
>>
>> SysNet s.r.l.
>> via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
>> http://www.sys-net.it
>> ---------------------------------------
>> Office: +39 02 23998309
>> Mobile: +39 333 4963172
>> Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
>> ---------------------------------------
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
13 years, 11 months
Re: (ITS#4868) Binary Attribute Patch(es)
by vargok@yahoo.com
(I realize this is ridiculously late, but... well, better late than never, and this is the first I've gotten back to it.)
Yes! It's working now in 2.4.x as expected, via the new userCertificate stub data provided by example. FWIW, it appears to be working fine with the PostgreSQL example files as well.
Unfortunately, it was never "back" ported to 2.3. We're currently using 2.3.43 as part of RHEL-5. Any chance it could get back-ported into the 2.3 branch?
Thanks,
Kevin
----- Original Message ----
> From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando(a)sys-net.it>
> To: vargok(a)yahoo.com
> Cc: openldap-its(a)openldap.org
> Sent: Wed, April 11, 2007 7:06:57 PM
> Subject: Re: (ITS#4868) Binary Attribute Patch(es)
>
> ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
>
> > Right. Time permitting, I'll check why back-sql behaves differently
> > and, in case, how to fix it.
>
> HEAD should be working as expected, now. I've also updated mysql and
> psql sql-test000 (the latter is untested, though).
>
> Please test and report. p.
>
>
>
> Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
> OpenLDAP Core Team
>
> SysNet s.r.l.
> via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
> http://www.sys-net.it
> ---------------------------------------
> Office: +39 02 23998309
> Mobile: +39 333 4963172
> Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
> ---------------------------------------
13 years, 11 months
Re: (ITS#6322) slapd suddenly stops working, and starts using 100% CPU
by helge@monsternett.no
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:00:25AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
>Sorry, your issue was closed since we hadn't received any feedback
>from you in a couple of months.
>
>The last trace you sent shows nothing unusual, just a bunch of
>threads all waiting to write on their respective connections.
If the core dump backtrace wasn't helpful, then please tell me so; I thought I had given you sufficient feedback, and that you were working on it.
>Have you tried the .21 release yet?
No.. I might do that next week. Is there anything else that I can do?
I just enabled trace loglevel, perhaps that might give us a clue on what's going on.
>--
> -- Howard Chu
> CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
--
Helge Milde, 69701808
www.monsternett.no
13 years, 11 months
(ITS#6247)
by daniel@pluta.biz
Hi,
I did just some small cleanups, but added no new functionality. I've
extracted the minimalistic slapd-api modifications in an extra file
called "now_slapd.patch" also contained in the tgz.
The code compiles and runs against todays version of "HEAD".
The new tgz-file can be downloaded from here:
ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/daniel-pluta-now-091229-1.tgz
Cheers
Daniel
13 years, 11 months
Re: (ITS#6194) Patch - Enhancement - provide LDIF support as libldif
by hyc@symas.com
rmeggins(a)redhat.com wrote:
> The ldif code does not currently have knowledge of any of the higher
> level LDAP data types such as LDAPMod or LDAPControl - some of the
> proposals would have the ldif API return these objects - Do we really
> want to introduce this higher level knowledge into the relatively low
> level libldif, along with the dependency on libldap? I think in order
> to do this properly, we would have to introduce a new LDAP API e.g.
> ldap_mods_from_ldif(const char *ldifstr, LDAPMod***, LDAPControl***) or
> something like that - something that would parse the given ldif record
> into those higher level data types.
Should have mentioned this sooner; this ITS needs to be merged with ITS#4033.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
13 years, 11 months
Re: Re : Re : ITS#6434
by masarati@aero.polimi.it
KISTER RAPHAEL wrote:
> I re-test with servers/slapd/overlays/rwm.c in version 1.125 and it works fine. I don't test with the next version.
Fine. The other modifications are not strictly related to your issue,
but rather to modifications to olcRwmMap using back-config.
p.
13 years, 11 months
Re : Re : ITS#6434
by kraph@yahoo.com
Hello,=0A=0AI re-test with servers/slapd/overlays/rwm.c in version 1.125 an=
d it works fine. I don't test with the next=A0version.=0A=0ARaphael KISTER=
=0A=0A=0A
13 years, 11 months