January 2023 - openldap-bugs

[Issue 9496] New: Some writes missing from database

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9496 Issue ID: 9496 Summary: Some writes missing from database Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: igfoo(a)github.com Target Milestone: --- With the attached test program, some of my database writes appear not to actually be written to the database. For example, a run may look like this: $ ./run.sh All done. All finished 1802 test.txt foo_200 is missing bar_200 is missing foo_404 is missing bar_404 is missing foo_407 is missing bar_407 is missing The script that I am using to run the program is below. This is using mdb.master 52bc29ee2efccf09c650598635cd42a50b6ecffe on Linux, with an ext4 filesystem. Is this an LMDB bug, or is there a bug in my code? Thanks Ian #!/bin/sh set -e if ! [ -d lmdb ] then rm -rf lmdb git clone https://github.com/LMDB/lmdb.git INSTALL_DIR="`pwd`/inst" cd lmdb/libraries/liblmdb make install prefix="$INSTALL_DIR" cd ../../.. fi gcc -Wall -Werror -Iinst/include loop.c inst/lib/liblmdb.a -o loop -pthread rm -f test.db test.db-lock ./loop echo "All finished" mdb_dump -np test.db > test.txt wc -l test.txt for i in `seq 100 999` do if ! grep -q "foo_$i" test.txt then echo "foo_$i is missing" fi if ! grep -q "bar_$i" test.txt then echo "bar_$i is missing" fi done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 week, 4 days

1
16
0 / 0

[Issue 9972] New: SSS needs READ instead of SEARCH access

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9972 Issue ID: 9972 Summary: SSS needs READ instead of SEARCH access Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org Target Milestone: --- I have configured an OpenLDAP 2.6 server with dn: olcDatabase=mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcMdbConfig olcDatabase: mdb olcAccess: to dn="cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org" by * search # no problem if this is READ olcAccess: to dn.sub="dc=aegee,dc=org" by * read … dn: olcOverlay=sssvlv,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config objectClass:olcOverlayConfig The content of the tree is available anymously by calling ldapsearch -ZZxH ldap://ldap.aegee.org -b "dc=aegee,dc=org" -s sub . When I modify the call to use SSS: ldapsearch -ZxH ldap://ldap.aegee.org -b "dc=aegee,dc=org" -s sub -E sss=ou:2.5.13.15 it also returns results, but ends with ``` # search result search: 93 result: 50 Insufficient access # numResponses: 3 # numEntries: 2 ``` When I modify above: olcAccess: to dn="cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org" by * read then the access is sufficient. There is no entry called "dn:cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org", or rather the entry shall not be returned on searches and `ldapsearch -ZxH ldap://ldap.aegee.org -b "dc=aegee,dc=org" -s sub` does not return it. These work without a problem: ldapsearch -ZxH ldap://ldap.aegee.org -b "cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org" -s one -E sss=ou:2.5.13.15 ldapsearch -ZxH ldap://ldap.aegee.org -b "cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org" -s sub ldapsearch -ZxH ldap://ldap.aegee.org -b "cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org" -s one This produces Insufficient access: ldapsearch -ZxH ldap://ldap.aegee.org -b "cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org" -s sub -E sss=ou:2.5.13.15 That said client-side-sorting does work without a problem, but server-side sorting requires not only SEARCH, but also READ privileges on dn="cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org". I find this is a bug: SSS requires read-acesss to data, which is not supposed to be returned to the client (dn:cn=bodies,dc=aegee,dc=org). For the additional server-side sorting no additional privileges shall be required, compared to returning the results without server-side-sorting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

3 weeks, 6 days

1
11
0 / 0

[Issue 9989] New: «make clean» shall not delete libraries/libldap/ldap.pc and libraries/liblber/lber.pc

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9989 Issue ID: 9989 Summary: «make clean» shall not delete libraries/libldap/ldap.pc and libraries/liblber/lber.pc Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org Target Milestone: --- «./configure» and «./config.status» do create ./libraries/libldap/ldap.pc, ./libraries/liblber/lber.pc, while «make clean» deletes both .pc files. «make install» fails, if ./libraries/libldap/ldap.pc or ./libraries/liblber/lber.pc are missing. «./configure && make clean && make depend && make install» is a valid workflow for many other (autoconf/automake based) projects. ./libraries/libldap/ldap.pc and ./libraries/liblber/lber.pc shall be deleted by «make distclean», and kept by «make clean». See also https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html for the idea behind «make clean» vs «make distclean». -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

3 weeks, 6 days

1
5
0 / 0

[Issue 9953] New: Push replication issue for the pwdHistory attribute

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9953 Issue ID: 9953 Summary: Push replication issue for the pwdHistory attribute Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.57 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dh(a)dotlan.net Target Milestone: --- Hello, I'm using a master ldap instance with a push replication instance to external slaves using the ldap backend on Debian 11 (2.4.57) and I came across some replication issues that forces me to drop the slave dbs and do a manually fullsync everything this error occurs. The problem =========== I know that replication and maintaining a password policy is a complicated task, especially since the ppolicy overlay must be loaded and active in every instance (master, push instance, slave). This problem leads to interesting challanges. First, I encountered a problem where pwdChangedTime would be duplicate because the ppolicy overlay of the push instance and the back_ldap/slave instance would like to set it (which leads to a duplicate attribute error). To fix problem I backported the patch [1] to my local version of the slapd packages. After this problem was fixed, I've encountered the next problematic attribute: "pwdHistory". I've play around with some syncrepl settings, but in the end, it seems to be a similar issue. It looks likes the pwdHistory attribute is not yet present on the slave and both instances (push and slave) try to add the pwdHistory Attributes which leads to a problem where both entries collied (pwdHistory: value #0 already exists). For whatever reason pwdHistory doesn't show up as modified field on the slave in the MOD request. But anyways. Something seems to be wrong, and it could a similar replication issue compared with pwdChangedTime I've lookup into the change history of the ppolicy.c file in the 2.5 and 2.6 branch but couldn't find a newer commit that would address this issue. Does anyone has encountered a similar issue? I've not played around with the 2.5 or 2.6 version, but looking at the code, I've either not seen a fix or the problem might still exist, hopefully I am wrong. Any suggestions? -- best regards Daniel Hoffend [1] https://github.com/openldap/openldap/commit/7a34f46d1cabe8e80937d5167b621... Setup ===== Host Master - Debian 11 slapd 2.4.57+dfsg-3 - slapd master instance with cn=config - push replikation instance with simple config (syncrepl from localhost, write to backend ldap) Host Slave - Debian 11 slapd 2.4.57+dfsg-3 - Readonly slave On all 3 instances ppolicy is enabled otherwise the operational attributes would be not known/available and sync of locked accounts or per account selected password policy assignment wouldn't work. PUSH Replication Instance ========================= database ldap [...] overlay ppolicy ppolicy_default "cn=default,ou=policies,dc=example,dc=org" syncrepl rid=__RID__ provider=ldap://localhost:389/ binddn="cn=replication,ou=system,dc=example,dc=org" bindmethod=simple credentials="secret" searchbase="dc=example,dc=org" type=refreshAndPersist schemachecking=off retry="5 12 60 +" attrs="*,memberOf,pwdPolicySubentry,pwdChangedTime,pwdAccountLockedTime,pwdHistory,creatorsName,createTimestamp,modifiersName,modifyTimestamp" --- Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_message_to_entry: rid=016 DN: uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org, UUID: db720f56-df0d-103c-8635-9543ccd6e97d Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 LDAP_RES_SEARCH_ENTRY(LDAP_SYNC_ADD) csn=(none) tid a0a89700 Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 be_search (0) Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_null_callback : error code 0x14 Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 be_modify uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org (20) Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: syncrepl_entry: rid=016 be_modify failed (20) Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapmaster slapd[2308611]: do_syncrepl: rid=016 rc 20 retrying SLAVE LDAP Server ================= database mdb [...] overlay ppolicy ppolicy_default "cn=default,ou=policies,dc=example,dc=org" --- Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176499 op=59513 SRCH base="uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org" scope=0 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176499 op=59513 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1 text= Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176500 op=59513 MOD dn="uid=user1,ou=accounts,dc=example,dc=org" Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176500 op=59513 MOD attr=structuralObjectClass creatorsName createTimestamp userPassword pwdChangedTime memberOf entryCSN modifiersName modifyTimestamp Nov 3 00:00:45 ldapslave slapd[2221506]: conn=176500 op=59513 RESULT tag=103 err=20 text=modify/add: pwdHistory: value #0 already exists -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 month, 1 week

1
3
0 / 0

[Issue 9887] New: Offer to mirror OpenLDAP

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9887 Issue ID: 9887 Summary: Offer to mirror OpenLDAP Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: mirrors(a)jevincanders.net Target Milestone: --- Greetings, We're from Jevin Canders, a hosting company based in New York (servers are in Buffalo). We're wondering if you wanted/needed another US mirror. We're already mirroring other open source projects, including Kali Linux and F-Droid. As of next week (tentatively), our mirror server will have a 20 Gbps pipe to work with, so we'll be able to handle new projects. Let us know if you have any questions, concerns, or requests. Sincerely, Josh Anders and Kevin Croissant JC Mirrors Team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 month, 1 week

1
8
0 / 0

[Issue 9956] New: Please register my company on the support page

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9956 Issue ID: 9956 Summary: Please register my company on the support page Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sjsong(a)aboutdap.kr Target Milestone: --- Hello. openldap page administrater. Please register my company on the support page. Please contact me if you need additional information. Registration phrase Seojindsa Co., Ltd. (Aboutdap Co., Ltd.)- Korea Provides consultancy, development, training and user support for OpenLDAP software in Korea. URL : seojindsa : www.seojindsa.kr, aboutdap : www.aboutdap.kr thank you. Song. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 month, 1 week

1
6
0 / 0

[Issue 9912] New: slapd attempting free on address which was not malloced

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9912 Issue ID: 9912 Summary: slapd attempting free on address which was not malloced Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: kimjuhi96(a)snu.ac.kr Target Milestone: --- Providing following command-line input results in invalid free. ./servers/slapd/slapd -h1 -h1 This issue exists in openldap-2.6.3 and the master branch of git. Environment: - Ubuntu 20.04 - clang-14.0.6 with CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" Backtrace: ================================================================= ==3323395==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: attempting free on address which was not malloc()-ed: 0x7ffc8512c238 in thread T0 #0 0x4d0077 (/home/juhee/project/foxfuzz/programs/network/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd+0x4d0077) #1 0xb77152 (/home/juhee/project/foxfuzz/programs/network/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd+0xb77152) #2 0x65ff02 (/home/juhee/project/foxfuzz/programs/network/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd+0x65ff02) #3 0x5168a9 (/home/juhee/project/foxfuzz/programs/network/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd+0x5168a9) #4 0x7ff21bd3c082 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x24082) (BuildId: 1878e6b475720c7c51969e69ab2d276fae6d1dee) #5 0x42130d (/home/juhee/project/foxfuzz/programs/network/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd+0x42130d) Address 0x7ffc8512c238 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 10072 in frame #0 0x515fef (/home/juhee/project/foxfuzz/programs/network/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd+0x515fef) This frame has 10 object(s): [32, 36) 'rc' (line 220) [48, 52) 'syslogUser' (line 230) [64, 72) 'waitfds' (line 234) [96, 100) 'level' (line 402) [112, 128) 'opt' (line 432) [144, 148) 'opt393' (line 717) [160, 168) 'errmsg' (line 726) [192, 196) 'buf' (line 778) [208, 336) 'ebuf' (line 798) [368, 496) 'ebuf524' (line 821) <== Memory access at offset 10072 overflows this variable HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported) SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: bad-free (/home/juhee/project/foxfuzz/programs/network/openldap/servers/slapd/slapd+0x4d0077) ==3323395==ABORTING -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
4
0 / 0

[Issue 9951] New: lloadd can lock up in cn=monitor modify

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9951 Issue ID: 9951 Summary: lloadd can lock up in cn=monitor modify Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- lload_monitor_conn_modify's callers have borrowed the cn=monitor entry from the cache, however it also observes memory management, so if the connection is released and it is the last thread around, it might be responsible for freeing it via epoch_leave(). However freeing it also requires that the connection be removed from cn=monitor and we can deadlock there. A fix is coming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
5
0 / 0

[Issue 9913] New: Some lloadd shutdown code doesn't protect memory correctly

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9913 Issue ID: 9913 Summary: Some lloadd shutdown code doesn't protect memory correctly Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- During shutdown, clients_destroy and tier_destroy are called while worker threads might still be alive, therefore they need to participate in memory management. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
5
0 / 0

[Issue 9907] New: lloadd config/shutdown leaks

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9907 Issue ID: 9907 Summary: lloadd config/shutdown leaks Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- lloadd leaks some memory in cn=config and at shutdown time. Fixes coming -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 month, 2 weeks

1
7
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs January 2023