On Montag, 26. Mai 2008, ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
> rhafer(a)suse.de wrote:
> >>> Splitting the above modification in two separate operations works
> >>> around that problem.
> >>
> >> What about using replace instead?
> >
> > That causes the same behavior as the modification pasted above. So
> > it doesn't work as well.
>
> Also, it might not be very practical if very complex indexing is in
> place...
Yes. But I think I fixed the original issue now. (r1.39 of
servers/slapd/back-bdb/attr.c)
--
Ralf