On Montag, 26. Mai 2008, ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
rhafer(a)suse.de wrote:
>>> Splitting the above modification in two separate operations works
>>> around that problem.
>>
>> What about using replace instead?
>
> That causes the same behavior as the modification pasted above. So
> it doesn't work as well.
Also, it might not be very practical if very complex indexing is in
place...
Yes. But I think I fixed the original issue now. (r1.39 of
servers/slapd/back-bdb/attr.c)
--
Ralf