rhafer(a)suse.de wrote:
>> Splitting the above modification in two separate operations
works
>> around that problem.
> What about using replace instead?
That causes the same behavior as the modification pasted above. So it
doesn't work as well.
Also, it might not be very practical if very complex indexing is in
place...
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------