Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote:
On 08. juni 2016 23:55, Howard Chu wrote:
> Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote:
>> I lost this thread (from May 19). Summarized in ITS#8435
>> plus a new suggestion: Revert sc_writewait and get it
>> done with a field somewhere else, maintained by callbacks.
>> Dunno if that's feasible.
> There is no "somewhere else" to use.
> I see no reason to revert the change.
The reason would be trying to not break third-party modules, like I've said.
But the problem is 1.5 years old and hopefully such a problem would have
been reported by now, so maybe there are very few affected modules out there.
> We can simply add sc_writewait to the
> end of the structure, which is the normal practice for adding new fields to
> existing structs.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/