openldap-devel January 2019

openldap-devel@openldap.org

6 participants
5 discussions

asserts and manadatory build instructions (was ITS#8240)

by Michael Ströder

hyc(a)symas.com wrote in ITS#8240: > Our patch response was too hasty. There is no OpenLDAP bug here, the real > issue is production binaries being built with asserts enabled instead of > compiling with -DNDEBUG. That's an issue for packagers and distros to resolve. > Closing this ITS, not an OpenLDAP bug. Maybe I missed something. But this is the first time I've heard about -DNDEBUG being mandatory when compiling binary packages for production use. Does it have other effects? And what are general rules for assert statements in OpenLDAP code? In my own (Python) code assert statements are supposed to be only triggered if something goes wrong *internally* (type issues etc.). If somebody manages to trigger an assert statement with invalid input from "outside" I always consider this to be a serious bug revealing insufficient error handling even though e.g. web2ldap just logs the exception but won't crash. YMMV, but please clarify. I also wonder whether there are more mandatory rules for building packages and where I can find them. Please don't get me wrong: My inquiry is in good faith to avoid unnecessary ITS based on misunderstanding. Ciao, Michael.

2 years

1
1
0 / 0

ITS review

by Quanah Gibson-Mount

There have been some reports coming in to the ITS system that likely should go into OpenLDAP 2.4.48/LMDB 0.9.23. These are: ITS#8969 - Tweak to LMDB page splits (already committed to LMDB RE0.9) ITS#8968 - ASYNC connect mode does not work on Solaris (<https://github.com/quanah/openldap-scratch/tree/its8968>) ITS#8967 - back-mdb "unchecked" limits broken with particular search scopes. Needs fix. ITS#8957 - ASYNC TLS mode is broken (<https://github.com/quanah/openldap-scratch/tree/its8957>) ITS#8963 - StartTLS failures with back-ldap due to bug in timeout calculation. Needs fix. ITS#8472 - only do index DB cleanup if DB is running (fix committed to master) ITS#8952 - High CPU usage when idletime is < 4 (fix committed to master) Any objections to me syncing these over into RE24? --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: <http://www.symas.com>

4 years, 8 months

4
7
0 / 0

ldbm: test target in Makefile

by Rouven WEILER

Hello there, I am actually writing a package for OpenIndiana. The automatic test routine may use the test target in the Makefile. What does the test target output mean? How can I see that the test passed successfully? As far as I saw up to now the outout seems to be supposed to differ in some lines… Can someone help me there? Thanks in advance.

4 years, 10 months

3
4
0 / 0

Logging TLS connection parameters

by Hallvard Breien Furuseth

I'd like TLS version/cipher logged with "TLS established", so I've cherry-picked these commits to our RE24 installation: 7d6d694 ITS#7683 log tls prot/cipher info 0045e56 ITS#7683 more for tls version/cipher info Also this looks like it should go with them, though we use OpenSSL: 7a7d941 ITS#7979 MozNSS fix for TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN Do anyone remember if this is complete, or if any fixups are needed? I've not spotted any more commits, anyway. -- Hallvard

4 years, 10 months

2
2
0 / 0

OpenLDAP stand at FOSDEM

by Michael Ströder

HI! As discussed yesterday we could run a stand at FOSDEM which takes place 2 & 3 February 2019 at Brussels. The CfP for various kinds of contributions: https://fosdem.org/2019/news/ Application form for a stand: https://submission.fosdem.org/stands.php I'd be willing to spend some time at an OpenLDAP booth. @Howard: Would you like to apply for it? I'm not sure whether somebody requested a IAM devroom again. Will try to monitor that. Ciao, Michael.

4 years, 10 months

5
14
0 / 0

← Newer
1
Older →

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-devel January 2019