OpenLDAP git repo?
by Volker Lendecke
Hi!
Out of several rumors I've heard that OpenLDAP converted it
source repo to git. Is that true? www.openldap.org still
speaks about cvs. If you changed to git, is the repo
publically available?
Thanks,
Volker
12 years, 8 months
Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldap search.c
by Howard Chu
ando(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote:
> Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldap
>
> Modified Files:
> search.c 1.273 -> 1.274
>
> Log Message:
> handle undefined objectClass values in search filters (ITS#6814)
Hmm. ava.c has been using the "(?attr=value)" format and
SLAPD_FILTER_UNDEFINED flag since 2006. Munging ought to handle any
attr=value, not just "(?objectclass=)".
Seems like we should just add a flag to filter2bv that tells it to generate a
regular filter string that libldap will parse and forget about this other
munging process.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
12 years, 10 months
Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/back-sock compare.c modify.c
by Howard Chu
hyc(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote:
> Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/back-sock
>
> Modified Files:
> compare.c 1.8 -> 1.9
> modify.c 1.6 -> 1.7
>
> Log Message:
> Fix a couple FIXMEs: use ldif_put to allow for binary values in
> compare and modify. Note that line wrapping is disabled; presumably
> existing code expects the compare argument to use only a single line.
> The manpage should be updated to note whether standard LDIF with
> default line wrapping is expected or not. (Add uses default width already.)
The same patch and considerations should also be applied to back-shell, but
I'm not bothering at the moment since I consider back-shell obsolete. Anyone
else is welcome to patch it if they feel like it.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
12 years, 10 months
ITS#6801
by Quanah Gibson-Mount
Should this new feature be added to the RE24 queue?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
12 years, 10 months
More items for RE24
by Hallvard B Furuseth
ITS#6760 is in RE24, though I never marked it Test. Did someone review
it as requested in the ITS?
Wishes:
ITS#6739 broken do_syncrep2().
Partial fix which can stand alone, so this no longer breaks:
CPPFLAGS=-DLDAP_THREAD_DEBUG ./configure
./run -b ldif test019
crashed because a thread unlocked another thread's mutex.
ITS#6792 (rwm suppressed LDAP response message).
ITS#6793 (bad free in back-ldap on matchedDN change).
Could add ITS#6727 to the ITS#6632 line in CHANGES, it's a dup. I've
marked Release.
--
Hallvard
12 years, 10 months
RE24 testing call #3 (OL 2.4.24)
by Quanah Gibson-Mount
Fixes to the dreaded solaris hang with back-monitor included. Please test.
:)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
12 years, 10 months
Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays rwm.c
by Hallvard B Furuseth
ando(a)OpenLDAP.org writes:
> rwm.c 1.138 -> 1.139
> make sure rwm_response returns SLAP_CB_CONTINUE (ITS#6792, as indicated by Hallvard)
Why the new 'default: rwm_matched( op, rs );'?
So you can rewrite matchedDN in responses to Abandon and Unbind? :-)
--
Hallvard
12 years, 10 months
librewrite & co vs. logging & ldap-int.h
by Hallvard B Furuseth
The ITS#6625 patch causes preprocessor warnings about conflicts
with ldap-int.h, so I'm looking again at old ITS#5421 to kill off
#include "...libldap/ldap-int.h"
These occur in librewrite, rwm, back-ldap and back-meta.
The #include is for two things: Expose struct ldapmsg & LDAP_FREE, the
need of which I've just removed in HEAD, and set up libldap logging.
I expect the slapd components just as well can drop the #include and
use slapd logging? back-*/search.c then need lber-int.h instead.
librewrite still needs the #define ldap_debug in ldap-int.h.
Instead we could either:
(1) use liblber logging in librewrite,
(2) or throw the code LDAP_INT_IN_KERNEL .. #endif /* LDAP_DEBUG */
out of ldap-int.h to a separate file, either include/ldap_log.h or
something like libldap/ldap-int-log.h. This file would not expose
structs with different definitions depending on LDAP_R_COMPILE & co.
Since the file when not LDAP_INT_IN_KERNEL does need to refer
ldap_debug to ldap_int_global_options.ldo_debug, that can be done with:
/* This struct starts with the same members as ldapoptions */
struct ldapoptions_prefix {
short ldo_valid;
int ldo_debug;
};
#define ldap_debug \
(*(int *) ((char *) &ldap_int_global_options \
+ offsetof(struct ldapoptions_prefix, ldo_debug)))
struct ldapoptions;
LDAP_V ( struct ldapoptions ) ldap_int_global_options;
Opinions? Put it in ldap-int.h, or ldap_log.h? Maybe the latter
only if #defined LDAP_LIBRARY_LOGGING (defined by the user)?
--
Hallvard
12 years, 10 months
RE24 testing call #1 (OL 2.4.24)
by Quanah Gibson-Mount
Please test RE24 heavily.
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
12 years, 10 months
Re: commit: ldap/libraries/libldap init.c ldap-int.h
by Hallvard B Furuseth
hyc(a)OpenLDAP.org writes:
> Silence stupid MUTEX_FIRSTCREATE warnings
And here I was hoping these warnings would prompt someone to pick up
ITS#5421/"librewrite & co vs. logging & ldap-int.h" (-devel nov 2010)...
--
Hallvard
12 years, 10 months
