William King wrote:
If stable is not dropped, at least have a page for known 'bad
for the releases. This would help to inform users why they would or
would not want a particular release.
It's up to users to pay attention to the features they use and the problems
they encounter, all of the information has already been provided. Aside from
ITSs marked "crash" it's not possible for us to judge what's a "bad
since each users' environment differs so widely.
On 11/09/2011 11:19 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:27 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
> <michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
>> => My suggestion: Simply drop "stable" completely and list only
>> releases with version number without further qualification. Today most
>> people can deal with version numbers quite well.
> I fairly well agree. OpenLDAP 2.4.23 has a number of serious
> problems. OpenLDAP 2.4.26 is much more "stable". I think it is
> unfortunate that 2.4.23 is still listed as the "stable" release on the
> downloads page. There may still yet be bugs in 2.4.26, but it is a
> vast improvement over 2.4.23, 2.4.24, or 2.4.25.
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Sr. Member of Technical Staff
> Zimbra, Inc
> A Division of VMware, Inc.
> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/