openldap-bugs November 2020

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
103 discussions

[Issue 9385] New: Opening an env with MDB_NOSUBDIR with no existing file returns error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 May '22

13 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9385 Issue ID: 9385 Summary: Opening an env with MDB_NOSUBDIR with no existing file returns error Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Mac OS Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: kriszyp(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 776 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=776&action=edit A fix to tolerate stat call on non-existing file Calling mdb_env_open with a file path to a file that doesn't exist yet, with MDB_NOSUBDIR on a non-Windows OS will return an error indicating that the file doesn't exist. This is supposed to create a new file, and works properly on the mdb.master branch, and still functions properly on Windows. The error is due to the stat() call in mdb_env_open prior to the file existing. I attached a patch that tolerates the absence of the file before checking if the file is on a block device. I am not sure if this is the appropriate fix, or if would be better to move this check later in mdb_env_open after the file is created, or alternately, determining the parent directory and calling stat on that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 9403] New: add option to completely disable syslog logging
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 May '22

12 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9403 Issue ID: 9403 Summary: add option to completely disable syslog logging Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.45 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: cvuillemez(a)yahoo.fr Target Milestone: --- For auditing purpose, I need to enable "stats" loglevel. So on heavy load, slapd send lots of events to local syslog socket /dev/log, when compiled with LDAP_SYSLOG (on Debian / Ubuntu). It worked fine on old systems with a simple syslog service. But when upgrading on system with journald+syslog, CPU "overhead" becomes totally crazy. It would be great to have an option at run time to completely disable syslog logging, or/and use a cutom socket, e.g. /run/systemd/journal/syslog to bypass journald service. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Bug 9189] New: Add GSSAPI channel-bindings support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '22

18 Feb '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9189 Bug ID: 9189 Summary: Add GSSAPI channel-bindings support Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: iboukris(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Recently MS has announce they plan to enforce channel-bindings for LDAP over TLS (ADV190023). To support it on client side, we need to pass "tls-endpoint" bindings (RFC 5929) to the SASL plugin, and make use of that in GSSAPI. See also: https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/pull/601 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Issue 9350] New: Expand test suite for null base
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9350 Issue ID: 9350 Summary: Expand test suite for null base Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Currently we have no tests that use the empty suffix (null base). This is an entirely valid configuration setup, and there are unique challenges and bugs that crop up with this usage. We need to ensure we're covering this use case, particularly with syncrepl and delta-syncrepl configurations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9282] New: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282 Issue ID: 9282 Summary: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.50 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Scenario: 2 node Multi-provider replication Add database to provider A ensure database replicates to provider B Stop provider A delete entry on provider B Start provider A Wait for provider B to reconnect to provider A Deleted entry re-appears -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 22

[Bug 9200] New: 2.4 to 2.5 upgrade documentation
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Aug '21

16 Aug '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9200 Bug ID: 9200 Summary: 2.4 to 2.5 upgrade documentation Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- For the 2.5 release, we need to document the upgrade procedures for moving from OpenLDAP 2.4 to OpenLDAP 2.5. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 9243] New: back-perl configure should test linking with libperl
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 Jun '21

23 Jun '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9243 Bug ID: 9243 Summary: back-perl configure should test linking with libperl Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.49 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ryan(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- ./configure --enable-perl && make [...] checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl [...] libtool: link: cc -g -O2 -o slapd main.o globals.o bconfig.o config.o daemon.o connection.o search.o filter.o add.o cr.o attr.o entry.o backend.o backends.o result.o operation.o dn.o compare.o modify.o delete.o modrdn.o ch_malloc.o value.o ava.o bind.o unbind.o abandon.o filterentry.o phonetic.o acl.o str2filter.o aclparse.o init.o user.o lock.o controls.o extended.o passwd.o schema.o schema_check.o schema_init.o schema_prep.o schemaparse.o ad.o at.o mr.o syntax.o oc.o saslauthz.o oidm.o starttls.o index.o sets.o referral.o root_dse.o sasl.o module.o mra.o mods.o sl_malloc.o zn_malloc.o limits.o operational.o matchedValues.o cancel.o syncrepl.o backglue.o backover.o ctxcsn.o ldapsync.o frontend.o slapadd.o slapcat.o slapcommon.o slapdn.o slapindex.o slappasswd.o slaptest.o slapauth.o slapacl.o component.o aci.o txn.o slapschema.o slapmodify.o version.o -Wl,-E -fstack-protector-strong -pthread libbackends.a liboverlays.a ../../libraries/liblunicode/liblunicode.a ../../libraries/librewrite/librewrite.a ../../libraries/liblutil/liblutil.a ../../libraries/libldap_r/.libs/libldap_r.a /home/ryan/tmp/openldap/libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.a ../../libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.a -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.28/CORE -lperl -ldl -lm -lpthread -lcrypt -lresolv -pthread /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lperl collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status It should probably test compiling and linking a program with the detected CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Issue 9363] New: removing olcReadOnly on a DB does not set it to FALSE
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 Jun '21

21 Jun '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9363 Issue ID: 9363 Summary: removing olcReadOnly on a DB does not set it to FALSE Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.53 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: maxime.besson(a)worteks.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 771 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=771&action=edit ldif config that reproduces the issue I am running the following test: * add olcReadOnly: TRUE on a MDB database in cn=config * Try to write to the MDB database => fails with "unwilling to perform" as expected * remove the olcReadOnly attribute from the MDB database * Try to write to the MDB database => still fails with the same error * Restart slapd * Try to write to the MDB database => OK However the following test works as expected: * add olcReadOnly: TRUE on a MDB database in cn=config * Try to write to the MDB database => fails with "unwilling to perform" as expected * modify olcReadOnly to FALSE on the MDB database * Try to write to the MDB database => OK It seems a little counter intuitive to me that removing a setting does not reset it to its default value. The fact that a slapd restart make writing possible again in the first test described above makes it seem to the casual user that olcReadOnly cannot be undone without a restart at all. Tested in 2.4.53 and 2.4.44, config attached but it probably works with any config (hdb, etc) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

2 9

[Issue 9295] New: ppolicy and replication: pwdLockedTime replication fails to replicate
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '21

03 Jun '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9295 Issue ID: 9295 Summary: ppolicy and replication: pwdLockedTime replication fails to replicate Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.50 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- If you have the following setup, a replica will hit an error during replication. a) ppolicy is configured on provider(s) and replicas. Replica has schemachecking=on in its syncrepl configuration b) account gets locked on the replica, so pwdAccountLockedTime is set on the replica but not on the provider(s) c) admin does a MOD/ADD op against a provider for the user entry to add a value to pwdAccountLockedTime dn: ... changetype: modify add: pwdAccountLockedTime pwdAccountLockedTime: ... d) provider accepts this modification. e) replica rejects this modification because the resulting change means that there would be two pwdAccountLockedTime values on the account in question Generally I believe that in this scenario, the MOD/ADD on the provider should be treated as a replace OP instead of an ADD op -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 18

[Issue 9396] New: Docs might recommend applicationProcess for ppolicy entries
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 May '21

10 May '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9396 Issue ID: 9396 Summary: Docs might recommend applicationProcess for ppolicy entries Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: kop(a)karlpinc.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 779 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=779&action=edit Suggested doc patch Hello, The ppolicy section of the Admin Guide does not say why the "people" object class is present in the example policy entry. I suggest that the docs explain. Otherwise the reader is left wondering why the particular choice of structural object class was made. The less informed reader is left wondering why a second object class is required at all. I also suggest that instead of the "people" object class, that the applicationProcess object class be used in the example to provide the structural object class the entry requires. The slapo-ppolicy man page might also provide guidance. Attached is a suggested patch, provided so that you have something to work from. If you're not happy with the patch go ahead and discard it, I'm not advocating any particular wording. I, Karl O. Pinc, hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
11
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs November 2020