problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept?

See <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html> for details on identifying the bug.

Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > I have a problem compiling the current OpenLDAP (2.4.18) in 64 bit > on Solaris. The problem occurs when building with modules and > enabling 64 bit in CFLAGS rather than setting CC to the compiler > including flags. The source of the problem is the old libtool > version 1.5.x included in OpenLDAP. The libtool maintainers > recommended upgrading libtool to at least 2.2 where the > problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, > or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept? > > See > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html > > > for details on identifying the bug. If you think this is an actual bug then you should submit a report to the ITS.

Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi, > > Am 24.09.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Howard Chu: >> Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> I have a problem compiling the current OpenLDAP (2.4.18) in 64 bit >>> on Solaris. The problem occurs when building with modules and >>> enabling 64 bit in CFLAGS rather than setting CC to the compiler >>> including flags. The source of the problem is the old libtool >>> version 1.5.x included in OpenLDAP. The libtool maintainers >>> recommended upgrading libtool to at least 2.2 where the >>> problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, >>> or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept? >>> >>> See >>> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html >>>> >>> for details on identifying the bug. >> >> If you think this is an actual bug then you should submit a report >> to the ITS. > > Ok, filed as ITS# 6306. Thanks. Now the next step is to get feedback from people building OpenLDAP on different platforms using this new libtool version. If we don't hear of any breakages, I don't see any reason not to upgrade.