Hi,
I have a problem compiling the current OpenLDAP (2.4.18) in 64 bit on Solaris. The problem occurs when building with modules and enabling 64 bit in CFLAGS rather than setting CC to the compiler including flags. The source of the problem is the old libtool version 1.5.x included in OpenLDAP. The libtool maintainers recommended upgrading libtool to at least 2.2 where the problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept?
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html for details on identifying the bug.
Best regards
-- Dago
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept?
OpenLDAP's libtool is forked, discussion relating to rejoining upstream is occasionally found on -devel. I'm sure work on this area would be welcomed.
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html for details on identifying the bug.
See the full thread of http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200901/msg00096.html for some examples/discussion of how the forked libtool can be used on sparcv9. Further discussion on this should be on -software.
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem compiling the current OpenLDAP (2.4.18) in 64 bit on Solaris. The problem occurs when building with modules and enabling 64 bit in CFLAGS rather than setting CC to the compiler including flags. The source of the problem is the old libtool version 1.5.x included in OpenLDAP. The libtool maintainers recommended upgrading libtool to at least 2.2 where the problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept?
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html for details on identifying the bug.
If you think this is an actual bug then you should submit a report to the ITS.
Hi,
Am 24.09.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Howard Chu:
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
I have a problem compiling the current OpenLDAP (2.4.18) in 64 bit on Solaris. The problem occurs when building with modules and enabling 64 bit in CFLAGS rather than setting CC to the compiler including flags. The source of the problem is the old libtool version 1.5.x included in OpenLDAP. The libtool maintainers recommended upgrading libtool to at least 2.2 where the problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept?
See <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html
for details on identifying the bug.
If you think this is an actual bug then you should submit a report to the ITS.
Ok, filed as ITS# 6306.
Best regards
-- Dago
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
Hi,
Am 24.09.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Howard Chu:
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
I have a problem compiling the current OpenLDAP (2.4.18) in 64 bit on Solaris. The problem occurs when building with modules and enabling 64 bit in CFLAGS rather than setting CC to the compiler including flags. The source of the problem is the old libtool version 1.5.x included in OpenLDAP. The libtool maintainers recommended upgrading libtool to at least 2.2 where the problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept?
See <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html
for details on identifying the bug.
If you think this is an actual bug then you should submit a report to the ITS.
Ok, filed as ITS# 6306.
Thanks. Now the next step is to get feedback from people building OpenLDAP on different platforms using this new libtool version. If we don't hear of any breakages, I don't see any reason not to upgrade.
Howard Chu wrote:
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
Hi,
Am 24.09.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Howard Chu:
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
I have a problem compiling the current OpenLDAP (2.4.18) in 64 bit on Solaris. The problem occurs when building with modules and enabling 64 bit in CFLAGS rather than setting CC to the compiler including flags. The source of the problem is the old libtool version 1.5.x included in OpenLDAP. The libtool maintainers recommended upgrading libtool to at least 2.2 where the problem was fixed. It would be nice if it could be updated, or is there a specific reason why the old version is kept?
See <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2009-09/msg00017.html
for details on identifying the bug.
If you think this is an actual bug then you should submit a report to the ITS.
Ok, filed as ITS# 6306.
Thanks. Now the next step is to get feedback from people building OpenLDAP on different platforms using this new libtool version. If we don't hear of any breakages, I don't see any reason not to upgrade.
Is it sufficient to set LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool before invking ./configure to use the libtool installed with the Linux distro instead of libtool shipped with OpenLDAP? Or is there more to adjust for the build?
Ciao, Michael.
-
Aaron Richton -
Dagobert Michelsen -
Howard Chu -
Michael Ströder