Michael Ströder wrote:
Let me restate: If "reside in a separate DIT" means a
this would be an awkward requirement.
I'd rather like to see another parameter which controls for which
entries the constraints are enforced applicable within the same
database. Similar to parameters unique_uri and/or unique_base of
Indeed, that could be useful. It would probably be useful for several of the
It would be even more useful to have a generic config feature for this
purpose, so that it doesn't need to be explicitly coded for each overlay. The
most logical approach would be to implement subentry support, and tie their
subtree search specifications into these functions. You're welcome to submit a
patch with this implementation.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/