10:47 p.m.
HI!
Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for Don't Use
Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an experimental OpenLDAP .666
OID s used which makes this control rather unusable outside OpenLDAP
implementation.
Ciao, Michael.
1:19 p.m.
Michael Ströder wrote:
Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for
Don't Use
Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an experimental OpenLDAP .666
OID s used which makes this control rather unusable outside OpenLDAP
implementation.
Filed ITS#7946 for that.
Ciao, Michael.
1:24 p.m.
Michael Ströder wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for Don't Use
> Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an experimental OpenLDAP .666
> OID s used which makes this control rather unusable outside OpenLDAP
> implementation.
It's been 1.3.6.1.1.22 in git master since 2011. The change will be in 2.5.
2.4 releases are ended as of 2.4.40.
Filed ITS#7946 for that.
Closing...
Ciao, Michael.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
1:27 p.m.
Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for Don't Use
>> Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an experimental OpenLDAP .666
>> OID s used which makes this control rather unusable outside OpenLDAP
>> implementation.
It's been 1.3.6.1.1.22 in git master since 2011. The change will be in 2.5.
2.4 releases are ended as of 2.4.40.
Why not in 2.4? RFC 6171 was published three years ago on Standards Track.
Ciao, Michael.
1:30 p.m.
Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>> Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for Don't
Use
>>> Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an experimental OpenLDAP .666
>>> OID s used which makes this control rather unusable outside OpenLDAP
>>> implementation.
>
> It's been 1.3.6.1.1.22 in git master since 2011. The change will be in 2.5.
> 2.4 releases are ended as of 2.4.40.
Why not in 2.4? RFC 6171 was published three years ago on Standards Track.
No idea. Must've fallen thru the cracks.
Ciao, Michael.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
1:31 p.m.
Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>>> Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for
Don't Use
>>>> Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an experimental OpenLDAP
.666
>>>> OID s used which makes this control rather unusable outside OpenLDAP
>>>> implementation.
>>
>> It's been 1.3.6.1.1.22 in git master since 2011. The change will be in 2.5.
>> 2.4 releases are ended as of 2.4.40.
>
> Why not in 2.4? RFC 6171 was published three years ago on Standards Track.
No idea. Must've fallen thru the cracks.
IMO it should be in 2.4. Any issue with that?
Ciao, Michael.
1:37 p.m.
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:31 PM +0200 Michael Ströder
<michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>>>> Is there any issue with using OID 1.3.6.1.1.22 as controlType for
>>>>> Don't Use Copy Control as defined in RFC 6171? Currently an
>>>>> experimental OpenLDAP .666 OID s used which makes this control
>>>>> rather unusable outside OpenLDAP implementation.
>>>
>>> It's been 1.3.6.1.1.22 in git master since 2011. The change will be in
>>> 2.5. 2.4 releases are ended as of 2.4.40.
>>
>> Why not in 2.4? RFC 6171 was published three years ago on Standards
>> Track.
>
> No idea. Must've fallen thru the cracks.
IMO it should be in 2.4. Any issue with that?
2.4 is done. Howard already stated that.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
5:38 p.m.
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:43 PM +0200 Michael Ströder
<michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> 2.4 is done. Howard already stated that.
AFAICS 2.4.40 is not released yet.
And IIRC there were commits to RE24 after tagging 2.4.40.
This has been committed to RE24 and will be part of 2.4.41.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
3250
days inactive
3289
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Howard Chu -
Michael Ströder -
Quanah Gibson-Mount