Re: imporvement to slapo-constraint (ITS#4987)
manu(a)netbsd.org wrote:
Gavin Henry <ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com> wrote:
> It would be best to move this dicussion to openldap-devel(a)openldap.org now.
Let's go...
Summarry: I've added a new feature to slapo-constraint for constraining
a value attribute the the existing values of another attribute. The idea
is that you can have a catalog of allowed values (eg: for titles: Mr,
Mrs, Miss) and constraint an attribute to these values
Before working further on this patch (style, dod), I'd like some feeback
on:
1) the way it's implemented: is there rought bugs, or is the logic fine?
I haven't looked at the patch yet.
2) configuration syntax: do we keep this one or do we swtich to
something else?
Something like
constraint-reference attr1 attr2
might be better.
For simple directives, it's better to use positional parameters and no tag words.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/