I'd say delete it unless of historical value (e.g., UMich-related) ... can't see why anyone would need to use it these days.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.comwrote:
--On Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:01 PM +0100 Gavin Henry < ghenry@suretecsystems.com> wrote:
----- "Michael Ströder" michael@stroeder.com wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and
earlier)
information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be
able to
archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use. Thoughts on how best to achieve this?
Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are not of such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain an archive.
Ciao, Michael.
It's not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted.
Anyone else have an opinion?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration