I&#39;d say delete it unless of historical value (e.g., UMich-related) ... can&#39;t see why anyone would need to use it these days.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:quanah@zimbra.com">quanah@zimbra.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">--On Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:01 PM +0100 Gavin Henry &lt;<a href="mailto:ghenry@suretecsystems.com" target="_blank">ghenry@suretecsystems.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>

<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
----- &quot;Michael Ströder&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:michael@stroeder.com" target="_blank">michael@stroeder.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:<br>
&gt; In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and<br>
earlier)<br>
&gt; information that is completely obsolete.  It would be nice to be<br>
able to<br>
&gt; archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use.<br>
&gt; Thoughts on how best to achieve this?<br>
<br>
Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are<br>
not of<br>
such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain<br>
an archive.<br>
<br>
Ciao, Michael.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
It&#39;s not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Anyone else have an opinion?<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
--Quanah<br>
<br>
--<br>
<br>
Quanah Gibson-Mount<br>
Principal Software Engineer<br>
Zimbra, Inc<br>
--------------------<br>
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>