I'd say delete it unless of historical value (e.g., UMich-related) ... can't
see why anyone would need to use it these days.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>wrote:
--On Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:01 PM +0100 Gavin Henry <
ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com> wrote:
> ----- "Michael Ströder" <michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> > In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and
>> earlier)
>> > information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be
>> able to
>> > archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use.
>> > Thoughts on how best to achieve this?
>>
>> Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are
>> not of
>> such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain
>> an archive.
>>
>> Ciao, Michael.
>>
>
> It's not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted.
>
Anyone else have an opinion?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration