Re: ordered indexing for integers

Howard Chu writes: > Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: >> Eeh. It makes more sense to check for ridiculous-sized numbers before >> parsing them and just output a min/max value depending on sign. (Or >> right-truncate e.g. n*12 digits and add n*5 to the length.) > Sounds fine. Looking at it now... not sure if I'll have time today though. (I assume I can go ahead and change the size, since you just changed the presence key size.)