William King wrote:
If stable is not dropped, at least have a page for known 'bad
the releases. This would help to inform users why they would or would not want
a particular release.
That's an even more blurry approach than the existing "stable" tag.
My rule is: It's better to have no information than
On 11/09/2011 11:19 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:27 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
> <michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
>> => My suggestion: Simply drop "stable" completely and list only the
>> releases with version number without further qualification. Today most
>> people can deal with version numbers quite well.
> I fairly well agree. OpenLDAP 2.4.23 has a number of serious problems.
> OpenLDAP 2.4.26 is much more "stable". I think it is unfortunate that
> 2.4.23 is still listed as the "stable" release on the downloads page.
> may still yet be bugs in 2.4.26, but it is a vast improvement over 2.4.23,
> 2.4.24, or 2.4.25.