William King wrote:
If stable is not dropped, at least have a page for known 'bad problems' for the releases. This would help to inform users why they would or would not want a particular release.
That's an even more blurry approach than the existing "stable" tag.
My rule is: It's better to have no information than incomplete/outdated/errornous information.
Ciao, Michael.
On 11/09/2011 11:19 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:27 PM +0100 Michael Ströder michael@stroeder.com wrote:
=> My suggestion: Simply drop "stable" completely and list only the releases with version number without further qualification. Today most people can deal with version numbers quite well.
I fairly well agree. OpenLDAP 2.4.23 has a number of serious problems. OpenLDAP 2.4.26 is much more "stable". I think it is unfortunate that 2.4.23 is still listed as the "stable" release on the downloads page. There may still yet be bugs in 2.4.26, but it is a vast improvement over 2.4.23, 2.4.24, or 2.4.25.
--Quanah