Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Francis Swasey wrote:
> Given that slurpd will not be included in 2.4, I'm seriously hoping
> (as one of the few people still using slurpd in production) that these
> changes to syncrepl will be perfected in 2.3 before we are forced into
> the syncrepl usage by 2.4.
I don't think slurpd will be wiped out of 2.4 yet. AFAIK, the only
significant removal in 2.4 is back-ldbm.
Well, I'd like to drop it, especially since it's not dynamically
configurable. But right now may be a bit premature.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/