Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Howard Chu writes:
> I don't think objectclass shorthand makes sense here. It would be pretty
> unusual to need this feature on e.g. all the attributes of inetOrgPerson.
True, but it can be useful to define object classes that are only to be
used in config directives, not in entries.
I've added a sortvals config directive; for now it just takes a list of
attributes. All of the current tests pass, but I haven't added any tests for
this directive yet.
The only interesting test (for me) is operating on a groupOfNames with a
couple hundred thousand members. Other folks may have other scenarios to try.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/