- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 10335] New: [PATCH] ldapsearch: fix handling of -LL in print_reference()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10335 Issue ID: 10335 Summary: [PATCH] ldapsearch: fix handling of -LL in print_reference() Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: bolek(a)live.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1066 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1066&action=edit [PATCH] ldapsearch: fix handling of -LL in print_reference() I, Boleslaw Ciesielski, hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice. The attached patch (against master) fixes a bug in ldapsearch where the -LL (or -LLL) option is ignored when printing the reference comments in print_reference(). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10334] New: When there is no entry in ldap db getting success response instead of noSuchObject
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 Issue ID: 10334 Summary: When there is no entry in ldap db getting success response instead of noSuchObject Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: niranjan.ganjikunta(a)ericsson.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1065 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1065&action=edit noSuchobject overlay module Hi Team, We are hosting an LDAP server on an Ubuntu Linux system, and our requirement is to return a noSuchObject error in the LDAP response when a search yields no results, instead of returning a success response. we are using below search command. ldapsearch -b "ou=Subscribers,ou=sda,o=centertel.pl" -D "cn=admin" -w "XXXXX" -H ldap://ip:389 -v -s sub "ptkSubscriberIMSI=26003123456789" This command is trying to search for the imsi under the base dn by using the filter. in this case if there is no entry present in db we are expecting noSuchObject (32) response from ldap. We tried to build overlay by using below c++ script to modify the default ldap behaviour to get nosuchobject when there is no entry in db. #include "portable.h" // Required for OpenLDAP build environment #include <stdio.h> #include <ac/string.h> // OpenLDAP-specific replacements #include <ac/regex.h> // Brings in regex_t, regmatch_t #include <ldap.h> #include "slap.h" #include <stdio.h> #include <ldap.h> #include <slap.h> int my_overlay_search(Operation *op, SlapReply *rs) { // Correct call to next overlay/backend int rc = overlay_op_walk(op, rs, SLAP_OP_SEARCH, (slap_overinfo *)op->o_bd->bd_info, NULL); if (rs->sr_err == LDAP_SUCCESS && rs->sr_entry == NULL) { rs->sr_err = LDAP_NO_SUCH_OBJECT; rs->sr_text = "No such object found"; Debug(LDAP_DEBUG_ANY, "Custom overlay: noSuchObject error triggered\n"); } return rc; } and by using below command build .so file gcc -fPIC -shared \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/include" \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/servers/slapd" \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/libraries/libldap" \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/libraries/liblber" \ -o "my_overlay.c" "noSuchobject_overlay.so" \ -lldap we didnt get any error while building the .so file. but while loading the module by using below ldif file content getting error dn: cn=module{0},cn=config changetype: modify add: olcModuleLoad olcModuleLoad: /usr/lib/ldap/noSuchobject_overlay.so config="/etc/ldap/ldap.conf" root@lodsto-essvt:~# ldapmodify -Q -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f new_load_overlay.ldif modifying entry "cn=module{0},cn=config" ldap_modify: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) additional info: <olcModuleLoad> handler exited with 1 and we got stuck in this module load. May be can you review and propose proper steps and script to build the required module to get expected ldap behaviour. Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10321] New: slapd garbles userCertificate hex code
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10321 Issue ID: 10321 Summary: slapd garbles userCertificate hex code Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jnabasny(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- I discovered an issue with how slapd handles hex encoded userCertificate;binary values while testing identical setups between FreeIPA and OpenLDAP. It seems to partially decode the hex, causing any search to fail. This was discovered when using SSSD, but is reproducible with ldapsearch. Essentially, you run a query like this using the hex encoded value of the certificate: ldapsearch -H ldap://10.10.0.94 -D cn=admin,dc=nabasny,dc=com -b "dc=nabasny,dc=com" -W '(&(userCertificate;binary=\30\82\04\85\30\82\02\ed\a0\03\02\01\02\02\01\0d\30\0d\06\09\2a\86\48\86\f7\0d\01\01\0b\05\00\30\37\31\15\30\13\06\03\55\04\0a\0c\0c\46\52\45\45\49\50\41\2e\48\4f\4d\45\31\1e\30\1c\06\03\55\04\03\0c\15\43\65\72\74\69\66\69\63\61\74\65\20\41\75\74\68\6f\72\69\74\79\30\1e\17\0d\32\35\30\33\32\30\31\35\34\35\32\36\5a\17\0d\32\37\30\33\32\31\31\35\34\35\32\36\5a\30\26\31\15\30\13\06\03\55\04\0a\0c\0c\46\52\45\45\49\50\41\2e\48\4f\4d\45\31\0d\30\0b\06\03\55\04\03\0c\04\6a\61\6b\65\30\82\01\22\30\0d\06\09\2a\86\48\86\f7\0d\01\01\01\05\00\03\82\01\0f\00\30\82\01\0a\02\82\01\01\00\b9\b2\3b\be\d1\20\bd\f2\ba\69\e6\b6\e5\2d\13\b0\77\a6\59\69\50\76\4c\07\71\ce\ee\8f\41\ef\04\20\1b\8e\a5\f7\8a\96\0d\f1\89\a5\84\cd\2f\be\ff\9c\2a\b2\bf\99\20\ca\ae\fc\a2\16\df\40\5b\d4\5e\7b\51\a5\b0\dd\bc\e9\c4\b1\e7\89\7c\25\f2\4b\b0\08\09\bd\60\58\c1\8f\af\fb\2a\5e\90\69\37\27\40\61\62\bb\7a\b8\76\18\11\96\2e\45\54\26\b0\c7\ec\92\3c\72\90\52\1a\44\0f\69\5c\b4\f1\98\53\4e\15\86\33\1a\81\ee\70\63\ae\e4\c7\32\7f\92\14\71\9d\58\c0\7d\a1\20\dc\f5\f6\47\29\45\56\bd\a2\dd\eb\4a\17\f2\2a\72\6f\fd\0f\a3\7e\a0\96\de\02\f3\b2\d9\ac\fc\af\38\c9\7a\21\c3\1b\19\4c\bc\d8\11\48\22\cf\18\ec\17\85\51\e9\51\22\49\aa\89\1a\73\2b\8d\40\e9\a9\3a\dd\e8\6e\9b\27\45\09\fd\a4\88\f5\7c\4e\96\b7\82\cd\f6\e2\1e\08\53\38\af\f9\4d\55\9c\79\0f\32\d8\bb\85\83\08\c0\b9\f3\39\7f\b9\7b\a9\02\03\01\00\01\a3\82\01\2b\30\82\01\27\30\1f\06\03\55\1d\23\04\18\30\16\80\14\0d\6b\b6\82\13\0c\a2\9d\91\01\40\e8\59\d6\2b\ec\87\1a\f0\36\30\3e\06\08\2b\06\01\05\05\07\01\01\04\32\30\30\30\2e\06\08\2b\06\01\05\05\07\30\01\86\22\68\74\74\70\3a\2f\2f\69\70\61\2d\63\61\2e\66\72\65\65\69\70\61\2e\68\6f\6d\65\2f\63\61\2f\6f\63\73\70\30\0e\06\03\55\1d\0f\01\01\ff\04\04\03\02\04\f0\30\1c\06\03\55\1d\25\04\15\30\13\06\08\2b\06\01\05\05\07\03\01\06\07\2b\06\01\05\02\03\05\30\77\06\03\55\1d\1f\04\70\30\6e\30\6c\a0\34\a0\32\86\30\68\74\74\70\3a\2f\2f\69\70\61\2d\63\61\2e\66\72\65\65\69\70\61\2e\68\6f\6d\65\2f\69\70\61\2f\63\72\6c\2f\4d\61\73\74\65\72\43\52\4c\2e\62\69\6e\a2\34\a4\32\30\30\31\0e\30\0c\06\03\55\04\0a\0c\05\69\70\61\63\61\31\1e\30\1c\06\03\55\04\03\0c\15\43\65\72\74\69\66\69\63\61\74\65\20\41\75\74\68\6f\72\69\74\79\30\1d\06\03\55\1d\0e\04\16\04\14\e8\11\4b\36\86\c9\7c\a2\d7\4e\ff\7c\13\89\2b\38\8d\c4\ec\32\30\0d\06\09\2a\86\48\86\f7\0d\01\01\0b\05\00\03\82\01\81\00\58\af\2b\7e\fd\05\b9\46\8a\c7\b9\e4\96\42\47\2d\8f\17\01\8e\58\30\95\9c\be\e7\2d\a8\22\64\5e\fd\f5\ec\46\97\2d\88\bc\06\b0\e7\a3\77\a3\d0\b6\da\01\4f\73\f4\3d\c9\47\49\e2\d0\a0\e8\bd\a9\62\fd\6c\de\81\32\9a\33\d5\58\57\d8\c9\47\54\78\fa\69\20\49\11\c9\dc\4f\f4\bc\37\63\28\6a\fd\e2\f7\4b\0f\44\26\90\6c\22\c9\b8\ff\9a\36\05\a3\24\3c\58\73\6f\4b\17\2d\e3\22\30\aa\34\4e\2f\36\24\94\6a\24\9b\bf\ac\e5\23\33\f6\3f\cf\c7\dd\38\91\85\63\c0\61\55\5f\de\2b\e6\3d\13\4f\8c\6a\6a\1e\3b\0e\4a\8c\e9\c3\46\ef\02\bb\63\b7\09\9f\d8\5c\67\4c\c6\40\8f\1e\7e\c8\f0\89\4c\8f\f8\24\63\42\31\f9\5d\5b\2d\cb\78\c3\94\5f\3e\ca\b8\7b\68\9a\6a\09\0c\22\bd\da\39\9f\b7\0f\4f\20\a9\1a\de\d7\8a\31\af\a3\ac\14\d1\ba\90\b8\22\56\31\b1\52\78\73\6f\36\05\88\0b\56\31\fd\55\89\7d\55\8b\01\1d\58\0c\75\03\bd\7c\7b\05\c7\86\15\90\0c\f4\c6\91\d3\f6\73\e9\8f\1f\25\88\32\b2\cb\53\db\91\e4\8b\28\a1\22\7a\38\ac\f5\8b\32\51\d4\9e\d6\e1\15\0d\fb\8f\60\09\e5\0c\dd\d4\19\fe\f7\44\cd\ac\ff\82\94\16\f5\7d\19\57\30\79\96\4b\7b\61\d0\b8\c3\0c\1c\2f\89\7e\01\5e\a0\95\9a\aa\d3\e2\6d\d5\fa\2e\e8\57\5a\b3\45\23\17\40\c9\d3\92\9e\11\cc\c4\31\f2\e5\94\e3\8f\5e\d9\51\92\cd\46\77\33\c8\4b\50\84\73)(objectclass=posixAccount)(uid=*)(&(uidNumber=*)(!(uidNumber=0))))' And slapd logs the query as: Mar 20 19:54:01 ldap slapd[457]: conn=1058 op=3 SRCH base="ou=people,dc=nabasny,dc=com" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(&(?userCertificate;binary=0\82\04\850\82\02\ED\A0\03\02\01\02\02\01\0D0\0D\06\09\2A\86H\86\F7\0D\01\01\0B\05\00071\150\13\06\03U\04\0A\0C\0CFREEIPA.HOME1\1E0\1C\06\03U\04\03\0C\15Certificate Authority0\1E\17\0D250320154526Z\17\0D270321154526Z0&1\150\13\06\03U\04\0A\0C\0CFREEIPA.HOME1\0D0\0B\06\03U\04\03\0C\04jake0\82\01"0\0D\06\09\2A\86H\86\F7\0D\01\01\01\05\00\03\82\01\0F\000\82\01\0A\02\82\01\01\00\B9\B2;\BE\D1 \BD\F2\BAi\E6\B6\E5-\13\B0w\A6YiPvL\07q\CE\EE\8FA\EF\04 \1B\8E\A5\F7\8A\96\0D\F1\89\A5\84\CD/\BE\FF\9C\2A\B2\BF\99 \CA\AE\FC\A2\16\DF@[\D4^{Q\A5\B0\DD\BC\E9\C4\B1\E7\89|%\F2K\B0\08\09\BD`X\C1\8F\AF\FB\2A^\90i7'@ab\BBz\B8v\18\11\96.ET&\B0\C7\EC\92<r\90R\1AD\0Fi\5C\B4\F1\98SN\15\863\1A\81\EEpc\AE\E4\C72\7F\92\14q\9DX\C0}\A1 \DC\F5\F6G\29EV\BD\A2\DD\EBJ\17\F2\2Aro\FD\0F\A3~\A0\96\DE\02\F3\B2\D9\AC\FC\AF8\C9z!\C3\1B\19L\BC\D8\11H"\CF\18\EC\17\85Q\E9Q"I\AA\89\1As+\8D@\E9\A9:\DD\E8n\9B'E\09\FD\A4\88\F5|N\96\B7\82\CD\F6\E2\1E\08S8\AF\F9MU\9Cy\0F2\D8\BB\85\83\08\C0\B9\F39\7F\B9{\A9\02\03\01\00\01\A3\82\01+0\82\01'0\1F\06\03U\1D#\04\180\16\80\14\0Dk\B6\82\13\0C\A2\9D\91\01@\E8Y\D6+\EC\87\1A\F060>\06\08+\06\01\05\05\07\01\01\042000.\06\08+\06\01\05\05\070\01\86"http://ipa-ca.freeipa.home/ca/ocsp0\0E\06\03U\1D\0F\01\01\FF\04\04\03\02\04… Authority0\1D\06\03U\1D\0E\04\16\04\14\E8\11K6\86\C9|\A2\D7N\FF|\13\89+8\8D\C4\EC20\0D\06\09\2A\86H\86\F7\0D\01\01\0B\05\00\03\82\01\81\00X\AF+~\FD\05\B9F\8A\C7\B9\E4\96BG-\8F\17\01\8EX0\95\9C\BE\E7-\A8"d^\FD\F5\ECF\97-\88\BC\06\B0\E7\A3w\A3\D0\B6\DA\01Os\F4=\C9GI\E2\D0\A0\E8\BD\A9b\FDl\DE\812\9A3\D5XW\D8\C9GTx\FAi I\11\C9\DCO\F4\BC7c\28j\FD\E2\F7K\0FD&\90l"\C9\B8\FF\9A6\05\A3$<XsoK\17-\E3"0\AA4N/6$\94j$\9B\BF\AC\E5#3\F6?\CF\C7\DD8\91\85c\C0aU_\DE+\E6=\13O\8Cjj\1E;\0EJ\8C\E9\C3F\EF\02\BBc\B7\09\9F\D8\5CgL\C6@\8F\1E~\C8\F0\89L\8F\F8$cB1\F9][-\CBx\C3\94_>\CA\B8{h\9Aj\09\0C"\BD\DA9\9F\B7\0FO \A9\1A\DE\D7\8A1\AF\A3\AC\14\D1\BA\90\B8"V1\B1Rxso6\05\88\0BV1\FDU\89}U\8B\01\1DX\0Cu\03\BD|{\05\C7\86\15\90\0C\F4\C6\91\D3\F6s\E9\8F\1F%\882\B2\CBS\DB\91\E4\8B\28\A1"z8\AC\F5\8B2Q\D4\9E\D6\E1\15\0D\FB\8F`\09\E5\0C\DD\D4\19\FE\F7D\CD\AC\FF\82\94\16\F5}\19W0y\96K{a\D0\B8\C3\0C\1C/\89~\01^\A0\95\9A\AA\D3\E2m\D5\FA.\E8WZ\B3E#\17@\C9\D3\92\9E\11\CC\C41\F2\E5\94\E3\8F^\D9Q\92\CDFw3\C8KP\84s)(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=*)(&(uidNumber=*)(!(uidNumber=0))))" Some of the hex has been decoded into readable strings, which causes the search to fail. Running the same search on FreeIPA with an identical user entry returns the entry correctly. I'm happy to provide more logs/details if needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs_review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10326] New: SNI passing requirements differ across TLS implementations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10326 Issue ID: 10326 Summary: SNI passing requirements differ across TLS implementations Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- mbedtls 3.6.3 has changed behaviour to correct a long standing issue where not setting a hostname meant hostname checking was disabled completely (CVE-2025-27809). It seems that how we do SNI vs. basic certificate checking differs between TLS implementations and our logic in ldap_int_tls_connect and ti_session_connect. This is also the reason test067-tls started failing on mbedtls builds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10163] New: Cleanup configure/test integration
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10163 Issue ID: 10163 Summary: Cleanup configure/test integration Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The sed commandline configure uses to perform substitutions is getting unwieldy and may be exceeding platform limits on various systems. All of the BUILD_xxx substitutions for overlays are only used in tests/run.in. They could be completely removed, and instead each of the enabled overlays could be emitted into a separate file that just gets included by the test scripts. There's no need for them to be part of the sed invocation at all. There's also leftover BUILD_xxx cruft from backends that we've removed (e.g. back-shell BUILD_SHELL) that nothing else in the tree references any more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9367] New: back-mdb: encryption support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9367 Issue ID: 9367 Summary: back-mdb: encryption support Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Need to add encryption support to the back-mdb backend, depends on issue#9364 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10324] New: Grammar error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10324 Issue ID: 10324 Summary: Grammar error Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ron(a)return.sh Target Milestone: --- In the documentation, y'all have: Acknowledgments The OpenLDAP Project is comprised of a team of volunteers. This document would not be possible without their contribution of time and energy. Either "comprises" or "composed of" should be used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 6938] Windows IPv6 support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 --- Comment #5 from Dhiraj Giria <dhiraj.giria(a)mitel.com> --- Thank you Matt, I have tried using mingw32 and mingw64 under MSYS2 environment. Using mingw32 and mingw64 fails during the configure step. Error while running mingw32: configure: error: IPv6 support requires getaddrinfo() and inet_ntop() Error with mingw64: Unable to load winsock.h and winsock2.h files as they collide with linux based socket libraries under sys folders. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6938] Windows IPv6 support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Hardin <mhardin(a)symas.com> --- Hello, Yes, I have confirmed that there are issues building OpenLDAP under MSYS2 with --enable-ipv6. What environment are you building under? Thanks, -Matt > On Apr 24, 2025, at 3:03 AM, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote: > > https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 > > --- Comment #3 from Dhiraj Giria <dhiraj.giria(a)mitel.com> --- > Hi Matt > I have tried building OpenLDAP 2.6.9 version with flag enable-ipv6 flag for > Windows environment, but failed to do so successfully. Is it a valid ticket? > can you please confirm if we support openldap+ipv6 on Windows? > > Thanks > Dhiraj > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6938] Windows IPv6 support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 --- Comment #3 from Dhiraj Giria <dhiraj.giria(a)mitel.com> --- Hi Matt I have tried building OpenLDAP 2.6.9 version with flag enable-ipv6 flag for Windows environment, but failed to do so successfully. Is it a valid ticket? can you please confirm if we support openldap+ipv6 on Windows? Thanks Dhiraj -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10254] New: Allow upgrading password hash on bind
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Apr '25

15 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10254 Issue ID: 10254 Summary: Allow upgrading password hash on bind Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: me(a)floriswesterman.nl Target Milestone: --- Many OpenLDAP installations are likely to contain relatively old password hashes such as SSHA and CRYPT, as modern alternatives such as Argon are only recent additions. Due to the nature of password hashes, it is of course not possible to "unhash" the old values and rehash them with a more modern algorithm. The presence of these old password hashes poses a liability in case of information leaks or hacks. Currently, the only way to upgrade a password hash is to wait for the user to change their password. This can be sped up by expiring passwords and forcing users to change them. However, this can be slow and frequent password rotation is no longer considered a best practice. It would be a very helpful addition to add support for upgrading a password hash on bind. This is implemented in the 389 directory server: https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/pwupgrade-on-bind.html Essentially, when a user binds, the password is checked like normal. In case of a successful bind, the proposed feature would check the hash algorithm used for the password; and in case it is not equal to the current `olcPasswordHash` value, the user-provided password is rehashed using the new algorithm and stored. This way, the old hashes are phased out more quickly, without being a disturbance to users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 7981] Feature request: Crypt scheme in pwdPolicy
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Apr '25

15 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7981 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=10254 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7981] Feature request: Crypt scheme in pwdPolicy
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Apr '25

15 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7981 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/763 Gone with another auxiliary objectclass but rereading the conversation, I guess I'll adjust to use a subclass later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10293] New: Log operations generated by syncrepl at STATS level
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Apr '25

09 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10293 Issue ID: 10293 Summary: Log operations generated by syncrepl at STATS level Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Similarly to how incoming operations are logged, operations created by syncrepl should be logged as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10322] New: Retire 2.4 admin guide
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Issue ID: 10322 Summary: Retire 2.4 admin guide Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- 2.4 release stream has been dead for a while now however its Admin Guide is still in place, we should remove it and possibly have links under it 301 to admin26? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10169] New: Add support for token only authentication with otp overlay
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Mar '25

27 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10169 Issue ID: 10169 Summary: Add support for token only authentication with otp overlay Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Currently the OTP overlay is password + token. It would be nice to be able to configure it so it can run in a token only mode, similar to the slapo-totp overlay in contrib. This would allow us to have a project supported solution and retire that contrib module. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '25

26 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 requate(a)univention.de <requate(a)univention.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1059|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10313] New: 3-way multimaster oathHOTPCounter attribute update code missing
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '25

26 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10313 Issue ID: 10313 Summary: 3-way multimaster oathHOTPCounter attribute update code missing Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: agrru01(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- I posted on openldap technical mail list and got a response saying I should file a feature request. I am using a 3-way multimaster syncrepl setup with the slapo-otp module. My problem is that when authenticating with a user using HOTP, the attribute oathHOTPCounter only updates the value on the target ldap instance. This means the other two ldap instances do not get the updated HOTP-counter value and therefore will allow authentication using the same HOTP code. Interestingly enough, if I manually edit the oathHOTPCounter value it synchronizes with the other masters. Please see the technical mail list discussion: https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-technical@openldap.org/… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10258] New: test050 failure: connection_close race?
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10258 Issue ID: 10258 Summary: test050 failure: connection_close race? Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1032 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1032&action=edit tail of slapd log Running test050 repeatedly, the slapd managed to get itself into an apparent inconsistency in the connections structure. The logs suggest that there might be a race closing the connection. Unfortunately the sanitiser didn't initiate a core dump in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10274] New: Replication issue on MMR configuration
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10274 Issue ID: 10274 Summary: Replication issue on MMR configuration Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: falgon.comp(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1036 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1036&action=edit In this attachment you will find 2 openldap configurations for 2 instances + slamd conf exemple + 5 screenshots to show the issue and one text file to explain what you see Hello we are openning this issue further to the initial post in technical : https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-technical@openldap.org/… Issue : We are working on a project and we've come across an issue with the replication after performance testing : *Configuration :* RHEL 8.6 OpenLDAP 2.5.14 *MMR-delta *configuration on multiple servers attached 300,000 users configured and used for tests *olcLastBind: TRUE* Use of SLAMD (performance shooting) *Problem description:* We are currently running performance and resilience tests on our infrastructure using the SLAMD tool configured to perform BINDs and MODs on a defined range of accounts. We use a load balancer (VIP) to poll all of our servers equally. (but it is possible to do performance tests directly on each of the directories) With our current infrastructure we're able to perform approximately 300 MOD/BIND/s. Beyond that, we start to generate delays and can randomly come across one issue. However, when we run performance tests that exceed our write capacity, our replication between servers can randomly create an incident with directories being unable to catch up with their replication delay. The directories update their contextCSNs, but extremely slowly (like freezing). From then on, it's impossible for the directories to catch again. (even with no incoming traffic) A restart of the instance is required to perform a full refresh and solve the incident. We have enabled synchronization logs and have no error or refresh logs to indicate a problem ( we can provide you with logs if necessary). We suspect a write collision or a replication conflict but this is never write in our sync logs. We've run a lot of tests. For example, when we run a performance test on a single live server, we don't reproduce the problem. Anothers examples: if we define different accounts ranges for each server with SALMD, we don't reproduce the problem either. If we use only one account for the range, we don't reproduce the problem either. ______________________________________________________________________ I have add some screenshots on attachement to show you the issue and all the explanations. ______________________________________________________________________ *Symptoms :* One or more directories can no longer be replicated normally after performance testing ends. No apparent error logs. Need a restart of instances to solve the problem. *How to reproduce the problem:* Have at least two servers in MMR mode Set LastBind to TRUE Perform a SLAMD shot from a LoadBalancer in bandwidth mode OR start multiple SLAMD test on same time for each server with the same account range. Exceed the maximum write capacity of the servers. *SLAMD configuration :* authrate.sh --hostname ${HOSTNAME} --port ${PORTSSL} \ --useSSL --trustStorePath ${CACERTJKS} \ --trustStorePassword ${CACERTJKSPW} --bindDN "${BINDDN}" \ --bindPassword ${BINDPW} --baseDN "${BASEDN}" \ --filter "(uid=[${RANGE}])" --credentials ${USERPW} \ --warmUpIntervals ${WARMUP} \ --numThreads ${NTHREADS} ${ARGS} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 14

[Issue 10026] New: Refresh handling can skip entries (si_dirty not managed properly)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10026 Issue ID: 10026 Summary: Refresh handling can skip entries (si_dirty not managed properly) Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Take MPR plain syncrepl with 3+ providers. When a provider's own syncrepl session transitions to persist and a it starts a new parallel session towards another host, that session always has to start as a refresh. If that refresh serves entries to us, our handling of si_dirty is not consistent: - if the existing persist session serves some of these entries to us, we can "forget" to pass the others to a newly connected consumer - same if the refresh is abandoned and we start refreshing from a different provider that might be behind what we were being served (again our consumers could suffer) - if we restart, si_dirty is forgotten and our consumers suffer even worse We might need to be told (at the beginning of the refresh?) what the end state we're going for is, so we can keep si_dirty on until then. And somehow persist that knowledge in the DB... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 10205] New: SSL handshake blocks forever in async mode if server unaccessible
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10205 Issue ID: 10205 Summary: SSL handshake blocks forever in async mode if server unaccessible Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.17 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: regtube(a)hotmail.com Target Milestone: --- When ldaps:// scheme is used to connect to currently unaccessible server with LDAP_OPT_CONNECT_ASYNC and LDAP_OPT_NETWORK_TIMEOUT options set, it blocks forever on SSL_connect. Here is a trace: ldap_sasl_bind ldap_send_initial_request ldap_new_connection 1 1 0 ldap_int_open_connection ldap_connect_to_host: TCP winserv.test.net:636 ldap_new_socket: 3 ldap_prepare_socket: 3 ldap_connect_to_host: Trying 192.168.56.2:636 ldap_pvt_connect: fd: 3 tm: 30 async: -1 ldap_ndelay_on: 3 attempting to connect: connect errno: 115 ldap_int_poll: fd: 3 tm: 0 ldap_err2string [2024-04-25 15:41:27.112] [error] [:1] bind(): Connecting (X) [2024-04-25 15:41:27.112] [error] [:1] err: -18 ldap_sasl_bind ldap_send_initial_request ldap_int_poll: fd: 3 tm: 0 ldap_is_sock_ready: 3 ldap_ndelay_off: 3 TLS trace: SSL_connect:before SSL initialization TLS trace: SSL_connect:SSLv3/TLS write client hello Looks like it happens because non-blocking mode is cleared from the socket (ldap_ndelay_off) after the first poll for write, and non-blocking mode is never restored before attempt to do tls connect, because of the check that assumes that non-blocking mode has already been set for async mode: if ( !async ) { /* if async, this has already been set */ ber_sockbuf_ctrl( sb, LBER_SB_OPT_SET_NONBLOCK, (void*)1 ); } while in fact it was cleared. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10162] New: Fix for binary attributes data corruption in back-sql
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10162 Issue ID: 10162 Summary: Fix for binary attributes data corruption in back-sql Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dex.tracers(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1006 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1006&action=edit Fix for binary attributes corruption on backed-sql I've configured slapd to use back-sql (mariadb through odbc) and observed issues with the BINARY data retrievals from the database. The length of the attributes was properly reported, but the correct data inside was always 16384 bytes and after that point - some junk (usually filled-up with AAAAAAAA and some other attributes data from memory). During the debugging - I've noticed that: - The MAX_ATTR_LEN (16384 bytes) is used to set the length of the data for BINARY columns when SQLBindCol is done inside of the "backsql_BindRowAsStrings_x" function - After SQLFetch is done - data in row->cols[i] is fetched up to the specified MAX_ATTR_LEN - After SQLFetch is done - the correct data size (greater than MAX_ATTR_LEN) is represented inside of the row->value_len I'm assuming that slapd allocates the pointer in memory (row->cols[i]), fills it with the specified amount of data (MAX_ATTR_LEN), but when forming the actual attribute data - uses the length from row->value_len and so everything from 16384 bytes position till row->value_len is just a junk from the memory (uninitialized, leftovers, data from other variables). After an investigation, I've find-out that: - for BINARY or variable length fields - SQLGetData should be used - SQLGetData supports chunked mode (if length is unknown) or full-read mode if the length is known - it could be used in pair with SQLBindCol after SQLFetch (!) Since we have the correct data length inside of row->value_len, I've just added the code to the backsql_get_attr_vals() function to overwrite the corrupted data with the correct data by issuing SQLGetData request. And it worked - binary data was properly retrieved and reported over LDAP! My current concerns / help needed - I'm not very familiar with the memory allocation/deallocation mechanisms, so I'm afraid that mentioned change can lead to memory corruption (so far not observed). Please review attached patch (testing was done on OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5_13, and applied on the master branch for easier review/application). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 --- Comment #3 from requate(a)univention.de <requate(a)univention.de> --- Created attachment 1060 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1060&action=edit slapschema-continuemode-and-preserve-rc.patch This extended version of the patch additionally preserves a non-zero return code even in combination with the option "-c". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 --- Comment #2 from requate(a)univention.de <requate(a)univention.de> --- Created attachment 1059 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1059&action=edit slapschema-continuemode.patch If the last object checked by entry_schema_check() has a problem, then slapschema returns the error code of that problem. But if there is a good object check after that, then it returns 0. That is not ideal. The tool offers the option "-c" to activate a "continuemode". The man page states "Enable continue (ignore errors) mode" and it is a bit surprising that the default behavior is different for the the return code of the main check. Also, while the message `# (65) Object class violation: unrecognized objectClass 'foo'` is output to stdout, the messages `67e293be UNKNOWN attributeDescription "BAR" inserted.` are actually output to stderr. They seem related, maybe it would be more consistent to output them to the same channel. The attached patch just proposes to exit the check loop in case entry_schema_check() fails and the option "-c" was not given. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10316] New: build/lib/mdb.c:5882: Assertion 'IS_BRANCH(mc->mc_pg[mc->mc_top])' failed in mdb_cursor_sibling()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10316 Issue ID: 10316 Summary: build/lib/mdb.c:5882: Assertion 'IS_BRANCH(mc->mc_pg[mc->mc_top])' failed in mdb_cursor_sibling() Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)konink.de Target Milestone: --- I am developing ETL software in Python and I am using lmdb as backend. For this I am using https://github.com/jnwatson/py-lmdb In this big process I am resizing the map_size dynamically. I would say it is certainly possible that I am reading at the same time. I end up in the following error: build/lib/mdb.c:5882: Assertion 'IS_BRANCH(mc->mc_pg[mc->mc_top])' failed in mdb_cursor_sibling() I ran my application again with a predetermined map size, and it did not assert. Since it is a single shot, I don't know if I can be certain that it therefore does not happen. When searching for it I found the following issue from 2017, suggesting it can be reproduced when running the performance test. https://github.com/bnclabs/dbperf/issues/1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10315] Re-Usage of Message IDs of async search blocks all available connections
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10315 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10315] Re-Usage of Message IDs of async search blocks all available connections
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10315 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- No OpenLDAP issue seen. Use proper file limit settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10315] Re-Usage of Message IDs of async search blocks all available connections
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10315 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|OpenLDAP-devs | Keywords|needs_review | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10318] New: Potential null-pointer-dereference in servers/slapd/connection.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10318 Issue ID: 10318 Summary: Potential null-pointer-dereference in servers/slapd/connection.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1367173408(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1056 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1056&action=edit execution trace Hi, I have found a potential null pointer dereference bug in the project and would like to report it to the maintainers. At line 267 and line 284 in file `servers/slapd/connection.c`, the function `connection_get` may return NULL. Then, at line 1239 in the same file, the pointer `c` receives the return value, which may be NULL. But `c` is dereferenced at following lines without checking, which may lead to a null-pointer-dereference bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10317] New: Potential null-pointer-dereference
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10317 Issue ID: 10317 Summary: Potential null-pointer-dereference Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1367173408(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1055 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1055&action=edit execution trace Hi, I have found a potential null pointer dereference bug in the project and would like to report it to the maintainers. At line 836 in file `servers/slapd/backglue.c`, the function `glue_tool_inst` may return NULL. Then, at line 765 in the same file, the pointer `on` receives the return value, which may be NULL. But `on` is dereferenced at line 766 without checking, which may lead to a null-pointer-dereference bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10266] New: Adopt broader RFC4511 NoD interpretation on lloadd's client side
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10266 Issue ID: 10266 Summary: Adopt broader RFC4511 NoD interpretation on lloadd's client side Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Server side, lloadd has long implemented a broad interpretation of NoD unsolicited response handling: when the message is issued, no new requests are accepted on the session however the client and server are both free to keep the session open if there are any operations that have not resolved yet. The server is still expected to close the connection as soon as no operations are still pending. This seems to interoperate with known clients. Those that want to will close the session immediately, unaware of this possibility, those that also want to interpret RFC 4511 this way can choose to wait for existing operations to resolve. This ticket is to track the lloadd's implementation of the client side of this - when receiving a NoD message, we don't close the connection immediately+unconditionally either but are willing to wait. Related functionality: - if connection was a bind connection processing a multi-stage SASL bind, the bind should fail if/when the client attempts to progress it - clients assigned to this connection through coherence at least 'connection' are also marked closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10310] New: Update pbkdf2 overlay so iterations can be configurable
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10310 Issue ID: 10310 Summary: Update pbkdf2 overlay so iterations can be configurable Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The pbkdf2 password hashing contrib overlay has the number of iterations hard coded at 10,000. It would be helpful to update the module to allow this to be configurable instead, as is done with other password hashing modules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10314] New: Only install the slapi-plugin.h header if building slapi library
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10314 Issue ID: 10314 Summary: Only install the slapi-plugin.h header if building slapi library Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: mattias.ellert(a)physics.uu.se Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1054 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1054&action=edit Proposed patch The slapi-plugin.h header does not make sense without the slapi library. The attached patch makes the installation of the header conditional. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10305] New: pkg-config should be used to find cyrus-sasl
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Feb '25

25 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10305 Issue ID: 10305 Summary: pkg-config should be used to find cyrus-sasl Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hi(a)alyssa.is Target Milestone: --- Static libraries do not encode their dependencies, so dependencies have to be discovered using pkg-config or another equivalent mechanism. OpenLDAP does not use pkg-config to find cyrus-sasl, which means that even if a working static cyrus-sasl library is available, it won't be used, because OpenLDAP's build system won't know to link its dependency libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10311] New: Work with IETF LDAP working group to update password hashing mechanism RFC
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Feb '25

25 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10311 Issue ID: 10311 Summary: Work with IETF LDAP working group to update password hashing mechanism RFC Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Work with the IETF ldap working group to update the RFC to make the suggested hashing mechanism be what is currently "best practice" rather than a specific hashing mechanism. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10024] New: MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 Feb '25

21 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024 Issue ID: 10024 Summary: MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT broken Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: markus(a)objectbox.io Target Milestone: --- It seems that the patch #9496 had a negative side effect on MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT. In certain cases, when opening the DB using MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT, the previous (2nd latest) commit is not selected. Instead, reads show that the latest commit was selected voiding the effect of MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT. I observed this in our test cases a while back. Today, I was finally able to reproduce it and debug into it. When creating the transaction to read the data, I debugged into mdb_txn_renew0. Here, ti (MDB_txninfo; env->me_txns) was non-NULL. However, ti->mti_txnid was 0 (!) and thus txn->mt_txnid was set to 0. That's the reason for always selecting the first (index 0) meta page inside mdb_txn_renew0: meta = env->me_metas[txn->mt_txnid & 1]; This line occurs twice (once for read txn and once for write txn; it affects both txn types). Thus, the chances of MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT selecting the correct meta page is 50-50. It's only correct if the first meta page (index 0) is the older one. I believe that this is related to #9496 because the patch, that was provided there, removed the initialization of "env->me_txns->mti_txnid" in mdb_env_open2. This would explain why txn->mt_txnid inside mdb_txn_renew0 was set to 0. I can confirm that adding back the following two lines back in fixes MDB_PREVSNAPSHOT: if (env->me_txns) env->me_txns->mti_txnid = meta.mm_txnid; The said patch including the removal of these two lines was applied in the commit(s) "ITS#9496 fix mdb_env_open bug from #8704" (Howard Chu on 09.04.21). I hope this information is useful to find a suitable fix. Please let me know if you have questions. Also, I'd be happy to help confirming a potential fix with our test suite. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10265] New: Make it possible to change olcBkLloadListen at runtime
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265 Issue ID: 10265 Summary: Make it possible to change olcBkLloadListen at runtime Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Currently, olcBkLloadListen changes only take effect on lloadd startup: - an added olcBkLloadListen should come online at the end of the modify operation - at the end of the modify operation a removed olcBkLloadListen will stop listening on the sockets associated with it, clients that connected over these are marked CLOSING - to facilitate replacing a value where URIs resolved sockets overlap, olcBkLloadListen should become a MAY in olcBkLloadConfig objectclass Lloadd's startup was modelled upon slapd's, but the requirements have changed considerably when it was turned into a module. Sockets are acquired at module configuration time, which is much later than standalone/slapd's own startup and so the way the URLs are handled also needs to be reworked. This will resolve other related issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Bug 9186] New: RFE: More metrics in cn=monitor
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9186 Bug ID: 9186 Summary: RFE: More metrics in cn=monitor Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- Currently I'm grepping metrics from syslog with mtail: https://gitlab.com/ae-dir/ansible-ae-dir-server/-/blob/master/templates/mta… With a new binary logging this is not possible anymore. Thus it would be nice if cn=monitor provides more metrics. 1. Overall connection count per listener starting at 0 when started. This would be a simple counter added to: entries cn=Listener 0,cn=Listeners,cn=Monitor 2. Counter for the various "deferring" messages separated by the reason for deferring. 3. Counters for all possible result codes. In my mtail program I also label it with the result type. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Issue 7249] slapd segfault with memberof overlay on frontend db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|TEST |FIXED --- Comment #23 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- RE26: • d66062dc by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T18:37:48+00:00 ITS#7249 Let backend_attribute know who's calling it • 5c734d2b by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T18:37:53+00:00 ITS#7249 Disallow memberof-addcheck when memberof is global -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7080] post read control in back-config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7080 --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- RE26 (2.6.10): • 8d19c205 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T18:06:29+00:00 ITS#7080 Do not munge path twice • f328965d by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T18:06:33+00:00 ITS#7080 Implement pre/postread for modrdn • c667f2ea by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T18:15:58+00:00 ITS#7080 Do not reuse back-ldif's stack for controls -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7249] slapd segfault with memberof overlay on frontend db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST --- Comment #22 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • 993f488e by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T17:29:04+00:00 ITS#7249 Let backend_attribute know who's calling it • f2cba910 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T17:29:04+00:00 ITS#7249 Disallow memberof-addcheck when memberof is global -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10296] New: Force a Mac OS full flush
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10296 Issue ID: 10296 Summary: Force a Mac OS full flush Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Mac OS Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: renault.cle(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1045 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1045&action=edit Use a F_FULLFSYNC fcntl when committing on Mac OS Hello Howard and Happy New Year, As discussed in this issue [1], the LMDB durability is incorrect when committing. I propose the following patch that uses fcntl with the F_FULLFSYNC flag. The fcntl documentation is on this page [2]. Note that I kept the calls to msync/fsync for simplicity and because they don't cost much but feel free to skip them on Mac OS. Have a nice day, kero [1]: https://github.com/cberner/redb/pull/928#issuecomment-2567032808 [2]: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/System/Conceptual… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10160] New: Add negset and negurl for slapo-constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10160 Issue ID: 10160 Summary: Add negset and negurl for slapo-constraint Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: manu(a)netbsd.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1003 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1003&action=edit Add negset and negurl for slapo-constraint Add negset and negurl constraints for slapo-constraint. THe two new types are logical not of set and url. They will fire a constraint violation if the set or LDAP URL query is non empty. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 7080] post read control in back-config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7080 --- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 86d23423 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2024-12-16T17:01:26+00:00 ITS#7080 Do not munge path twice • e5826622 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2024-12-16T17:01:26+00:00 ITS#7080 Implement pre/postread for modrdn • 70d8e22d by Ondřej Kuzník at 2024-12-16T17:01:26+00:00 ITS#7080 Do not reuse back-ldif's stack for controls -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10294] New: Overlay seems to load before schema in folder configuration mode
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Feb '25

13 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10294 Issue ID: 10294 Summary: Overlay seems to load before schema in folder configuration mode Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: pduvax(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- In the folder configuration (vs slapd.conf file), the modules seem to be loaded before schema folders files. This makes troubles with memberOf attributeType which is created by the dynlist overlay if missing (cf. the base function "dynlist_initialize" which starts by doing this). As the schema files are not yet loaded, it creates systematically the attributes which then prohibits the load of msuser.ldif schema without raising the error "Duplicate attributeType". I found a workaround by naming the entry of the dynlist overlay olcModuleList cn=z-module{X} while z is alphanumerically after cn=schema. But as it is hazardous, I think that the best way is to load modules after the schema by the code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10306] New: epoll, kqueue etc. are not used when cross compiling
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Feb '25

11 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10306 Issue ID: 10306 Summary: epoll, kqueue etc. are not used when cross compiling Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hi(a)alyssa.is Target Milestone: --- OpenLDAP's build system relies on running test programs to see whether epoll or kqueue are available, after checking the headers are available. When cross compiling, test programs can't be run, and even if they could, they wouldn't produce useful results because they'd be testing the build machine. Running test programs like this isn't even a great idea for native builds, because the package is still quite likely to end up running on a different machine than it was built for — think about distro packages. This means that cross-compiled OpenLDAP ends up using select, even though it could almost certainly use epoll or kqueue. The best thing to do for this sort of thing is to check at runtime whether the epoll/kqueue/whatever is available, and fall back if not, but this would probably be hard to implement in OpenLDAP. Other, easier, things that could be done to improve the situation would be: • Assume that epoll/kqueue are available if the headers are. It's very unlikely nowadays that a system with the headers won't actually have the API available. • If the AC_RUN_IFELSE checks are staying, make sure that they're all overridabel with configure flags or at least AC_CACHE_CHECK. There are also uses of AC_RUN_IFELSE for pthreads, which presumably have the same problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10308] New: Implement cn=monitor for back-asyncmeta
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Feb '25

11 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10308 Issue ID: 10308 Summary: Implement cn=monitor for back-asyncmeta Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Currently back-asyncmeta has no cn=monitor capabilities. It will be useful to implement some, specifically to monitor targets and target connection states. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10139] back-config discloses existence of entries contrary to ACL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Feb '25

10 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=10307 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs