HI!
Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have NO-USER-MODIFICATION.
memberof.c contains a commented line:
/* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */ /* add? */
But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added.
Any objections against adding it?
Ciao, Michael.
Michael Ströder wrote:
HI!
Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have NO-USER-MODIFICATION.
memberof.c contains a commented line:
/* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */ /* add? */But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added.
Any objections against adding it?
Ciao, Michael.
ISTR a few things would break when that was uncommented. Feel free to test it out though.
On 7/11/19 6:43 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
Currently attribute type description memberOf does not have NO-USER-MODIFICATION.
memberof.c contains a commented line: /* "NO-USER-MODIFICATION " */ /* add? */
But it's my understanding that if the memberof overlay is responsible maintaining this attribute NO-USER-MODIFICATION should be added.
Any objections against adding it?
ISTR a few things would break when that was uncommented. Feel free to test it out though.
Hmm, the git log is pretty terse. This commit after intial import only added comments:
------------------------ snip ------------------------ commit e33abd467c526a740a10f77e84ccc78d7b18e6d7 Author: Pierangelo Masarati ando@openldap.org Date: Sat Aug 25 16:02:43 2007 +0000
needs work: memberOf should not be replicated ------------------------ snip ------------------------
There's no reasoning why 'memberOf' should not be replicated. IMHO it should be replicated to avoid the effects described in ITS#8613 [1].
Can anyone shed some light on this?
Ciao, Michael.
-
Howard Chu -
Michael Ströder