Gavin Henry wrote:
Dear All,
For the backend type for all the replication examples I'm doing just now,
should we use bdb or hdb?
I notice that in slapd.conf.default we are using bdb.
I'm in no hurry to deprecate back-bdb, and back-hdb's initial performance is
heavily dependent on priming its IDL cache. It's a tossup - back-bdb with no
subtree renames but less cache sensitivity, or back-hdb with full directory
semantics and more cache sensitivity. I suspect we'll be carrying both for a
long time, because of this tradeoff.
Thoughts?
Gavin.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp.
http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun
http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP
http://www.openldap.org/project/