Howard Chu wrote:
I suppose I should at least write up an Informational RFC to go along with this
what's its status?
I think the reqControls and reqRespControls (not implemented yet by accesslog; I'm working at it) should have "X-ORDERED 'VALUES'", as ordering __might__ matter (RFC 4511 is not quite definitive on the subject:
Additionally, unless order-dependent semantics are given in a specification, the order of a combination of controls in the SEQUENCE is ignored.
but at least it leaves room for specifying order-based semantics).
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it ---------------------------------------
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
I suppose I should at least write up an Informational RFC to go along with this
what's its status?
I think the reqControls and reqRespControls (not implemented yet by accesslog; I'm working at it) should have "X-ORDERED 'VALUES'", as ordering __might__ matter (RFC 4511 is not quite definitive on the subject:
Additionally, unless order-dependent semantics are given in a specification, the order of a combination of controls in the SEQUENCE is ignored.
but at least it leaves room for specifying order-based semantics).
Nevermind, I've found a spec with X-ORDERED...
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it ---------------------------------------
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
I suppose I should at least write up an Informational RFC to go along with this
what's its status?
I think the reqControls and reqRespControls (not implemented yet by accesslog; I'm working at it) should have "X-ORDERED 'VALUES'", as ordering __might__ matter (RFC 4511 is not quite definitive on the subject:
Additionally, unless order-dependent semantics are given in a specification, the order of a combination of controls in the SEQUENCE is ignored.
but at least it leaves room for specifying order-based semantics).
Nevermind, I've found a spec with X-ORDERED...
Right, as documented here http://www.highlandsun.com/hyc/drafts/draft-chu-ldap-logschema-xx.html they are intended to be Ordered.
Unfortunately the dependency on the xordered spec has kind of held up publishing of the logschema spec, since the xordered spec still needs a lot of corrections.
-
Howard Chu -
Pierangelo Masarati