<quote who="Quanah Gibson-Mount"> > This release showed amazing promise in the past as the first release to > move to after 4.2 that showed real performance gains across the board. > Curious to see if the official release will hold up. Are you going to do some nice benchmarks? ;-)

<quote who="Quanah Gibson-Mount"> > --On Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:21 AM +0100 Gavin Henry > <ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com&gt; wrote: > >> <quote who="Quanah Gibson-Mount"> >>> This release showed amazing promise in the past as the first release to >>> move to after 4.2 that showed real performance gains across the board. >>> Curious to see if the official release will hold up. >> Are you going to do some nice benchmarks? ;-) > I'd like to. In true sleepycat fashion, they changed the API before the > official release, which means someone (guessing Howard) needs to see what > has changed to make it so that OpenLDAP works with it. I've now got it installed and compiling 2.3.37 against it. I'll report back what works and what breaks ;-)

--On Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:00 AM +0100 Gavin Henry <ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com&gt; wrote: > <quote who="Quanah Gibson-Mount"> >> --On Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:21 AM +0100 Gavin Henry >> <ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> <quote who="Quanah Gibson-Mount"> >>>> This release showed amazing promise in the past as the first release >>>> to >>>> move to after 4.2 that showed real performance gains across the >>>> board. >>>> Curious to see if the official release will hold up. >>> >>> Are you going to do some nice benchmarks? ;-) >> >> I'd like to. In true sleepycat fashion, they changed the API before >> the >> official release, which means someone (guessing Howard) needs to see >> what >> has changed to make it so that OpenLDAP works with it. > > I've now got it installed and compiling 2.3.37 against it. I'll report > back what works and what breaks ;-) Ah, I'd already done that. It broke immediately in test001. ;)

--Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

On Tuesday 24 July 2007 09:36, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > I'd like to. In true sleepycat fashion, they changed the API before the > official release, Yes, it seems that they at least changed something in the DBC structure. The "locker" attribute is now of the type DB_LOCKER (a new structure) instead of an u_int32_t as it was in older revisions.

> which means someone (guessing Howard) needs to see what > has changed to make it so that OpenLDAP works with it.

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:21 AM +0100 Gavin Henry > > <ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com&gt; wrote: >> <quote who="Quanah Gibson-Mount"> >> >>> This release showed amazing promise in the past as the first release to >>> move to after 4.2 that showed real performance gains across the board. >>> Curious to see if the official release will hold up. >> >> Are you going to do some nice benchmarks? ;-) > > I'd like to. In true sleepycat fashion, they changed the API before the > official release, which means someone (guessing Howard) needs to see what > has changed to make it so that OpenLDAP works with it. http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/upgrade.4 .6/win.html This is a problem for the Windows version. I wonder why they changed it.