I'm playing with test050, i.e. running it, copying con directory to con2
and then starting the original provider and consumer up. Then starting up
con2 on ldap://:9013/
All fine, then I go about adding a new syncrepl on cn=config and
dc=example,dc=com pointing to ldap://:9013/
I'm not using LDIF, just messing with JXplorer.
Everything worked ok, with a couple of crashes at the point I added a new
syncrepl on con2 point to itself.
Both pro and con died with:
lt-slapd: attr.c:481: attr_merge: Assertion `( nvals == ((void *)0) &&
(*a)->a_nvals == (*a)->a_vals ) || ( nvals != ((void *)0) && ( (
(*a)->a_vals == ((void *)0) && (*a)->a_nvals == ((void *)0) ) || (
(*a)->a_nvals != (*a)->a_vals ) ) )' failed.
I guess I should pay attention more to the order in test050 and timing.
Lastly, how do we define test050 to be a multimaster test when there are
only two instances of slapd?
Is it because we have 2 sycnrepl on cn=config and then another two on the
bdb backends? I thought a test for this would include at least 3 running
T +44 (0) 1224 279484
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 824887
Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).