Re: ACL check parameters

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: > Howard Chu writes: >> oprofile shows quite a bit more overhead in 2.4's ACL processing vs >> 2.3's. I'm thinking of streamlining things a bit, along these lines. >> Any thoughts? > > Only a few loose ones: > > A brief look shows some deep indirection, which may be harder for > compilers to optimize due to possible aliasing among intervening writes. > Maybe you should help by unpacking some more common expressions into > local variables. Profiling showed that the ACLCHECK branch didn't have any improvement over HEAD. Looks like it may not be worth the trouble.