Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> Howard Chu writes:
>> oprofile shows quite a bit more overhead in 2.4's ACL processing vs
>> 2.3's. I'm thinking of streamlining things a bit, along these lines.
>> Any thoughts?
> Only a few loose ones:
> A brief look shows some deep indirection, which may be harder for
> compilers to optimize due to possible aliasing among intervening writes.
> Maybe you should help by unpacking some more common expressions into
> local variables.
Profiling showed that the ACLCHECK branch didn't have any improvement over
HEAD. Looks like it may not be worth the trouble.
Are you going to drop this?