Re: Performance improvements for set-based ACLs?
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
On 02/03/2014 07:48 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Yes, I know:
> Set-based ACLs are slow even if one properly sets index configuration.
>
> But I'd like to raise a discussion here whether it would be possible to improve
> the performance within slapd.
>
> Any thoughts?
What about profiling some use cases of interest?
I'm not sure what exactly you mean. Be assured that I'm already trying to
re-arrange the ACLs to make things faster. IMO I also defined decent indexing
configuration.
Or do you want to see some use-cases I've implemented?
Ciao, Michael.
Attachments:
- smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature — 2.3 KB)