Re: postalAddress matching rule
--On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 7:13 PM +0200 Michael Ströder
<michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
> Does the RFC proclaim a matching rule for postalAddress? Because if it
> doesn't, there's no point in defining one. ;) If an attr doesn't have a
> matching rule, you have to use a replace op rather than delete.
Yes. And OpenLDAP even announces it in the subschema without implementing
it (see also ITS#5608). :-(
Ah, well, then I certainly encourage Brett to implement it. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration