Howard Chu wrote:
> I thought this was going to be replaced by dynlist, whose
> functionality it provides a subset. Note that in HEAD dynlist can
> also be instantiated under the name "dyngroup" (see obsolete names),
> with the same configuration syntax.
Hm, the last I remember we had agreed that dyngroup should continue to
be used, since dynlist does a lot more than dyngroup needed. Did I miss
something?
Well, at some point yes, because dynlist was doing compare in a less
efficient manner, but I think this has been fixed. Otherwise, I would
have probably added back-config support earlier... not a big deal, just
wondering.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------