Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Not worried by being accurate, but by potential indetermination of concurrently performing algebra on non-atomic types (no idea of how this could surface, though: one count missing?, sigsegv? death by chocolate?).
Ah I see, you're inserting records into an AVL tree. OK, since it's only going to occur for non-indexed searches, the current code looks fine.
- pcache private database access: add a control and an exop that allow
access to the private database for administrative/monitoring purposes, and consistent cached query removal (namely: removal of a specific query and related queryID from participating entries; removal of an entry and invalidation of all related queries, ...)
I don't see any reason not to. Have you got a spec for the control and exop?
Maybe not really a spec... http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1420.html.