Re: back-bdb flaw
Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
>> Seems like the best fix is to deprecate back-bdb and only use back-hdb
>> from now on.
>
> But I vaguely remember that back-hdb has higher memory consumption.
Eh? back-hdb has a smaller memory footprint, as well as a smaller
on-disk footprint.
Glad to stand corrected regarding this. ;-)
Ciao, Michael.