Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Seems like the best fix is to deprecate back-bdb and only use back-hdb from now on.
But I vaguely remember that back-hdb has higher memory consumption.
Eh? back-hdb has a smaller memory footprint, as well as a smaller on-disk footprint.
Glad to stand corrected regarding this. ;-)
Ciao, Michael.