Re: RE24 testing call #1 (OL 2.4.24)
Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
This was just a checkpoint to make sure what was done so far
doesn't break
anything.
Ah, OK.
> Some issues it'd be nice to have in, if they're simple
for those who
> know the code in question:
>
> ITS#6760 rwm broken entry handling
> Fixed, I think, but needs review
This will be in the next set.
Someone's OKed it? I copied/moved what some of the code was doing, but
I don't know why it was doing it. (Noted in the ITS.)
> ITS#6532 Support for common orderingMatching rules in extensible
match
> filters TODO: Handle CSN and UUID ordering match too?
> (Almost certainly OK, but I wanted someone who knows to say so. It's
> a two-line update, setting the SLAP_MR_EXT flag for these rules.)
>
> Also, possibly the rest of "ITS#6739 broken do_syncrep2()" is simple.
> Almost fixed.
If you get these committed, I can add them.
I've committed my part, but someone who knows syncrepl must do the rest.
--
Hallvard