On Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2008, Michael Ströder wrote:
Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
>> For 1. I usually ask my customers how they are going to implement
>> the change management. After some discussion we usually end up
>> with text-based config managed with version control. Something
>> simple and handy. :-)
>
> Yes, I guess that this works pretty well when you deploy OpenLDAP
> (or basically any other software) at a single customer. It gets
> harder when you ship OpenLDAP as a part of a product,
I already imagined what your aim is. ;-)
Of course my aim is somewhat focused on
what I am getting paid for,
whose isn't? :) But additionally to that I was trying to find out if
there is a general interest among the OpenLDAP Developers to have some
kind of management tools/api. If there were, we could have started
something that would serve both interests. I am trying to avoid a
solution just specific to our products.
> that is also used by people
> that are not too familiar with OpenLDAP. Ok, one might argue now,
> that people not really familiar with OpenLDAP should not use it,
> but I tend to disagree a bit here ;).
It's always difficult to draw the line. At least the approach with
back-config makes it easier for a tool like yast to stay away from
configuration changes made by a sophisticated admin compared to
parsing full text files.
--
Ralf