I have a database rooted at "", and would like to use the monitor backend
as well. I found that if I put "database monitor" before the 'database
definition, it will load just fine. However, if it is defined afterwards,
it fails to load, since "" overloads it context. I understand that that is
correct from a technical standpoint, but IIRC, there have been issues in
the past having "database monitor" come before other database definitions.
I thought it would be worthwhile to allow "database monitor" to be
instantiated after a 'database ""' definition. Thoughts?
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration