--On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:09 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
On 1/29/20 7:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 6:52 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
> <michael(a)stroeder.com> wrote:
>> On 1/28/20 7:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>> Also, I really really really would like 2.4.49 to be the end of 2.4,
>>> outside the possibility of some critical CVEs.
>> But that's just your personal goal which is leaving systems in
>> production unpatched until you feel you're done. IMO that's totally
> No, it's the project goal to switch the focus to getting OpenLDAP 2.5
> released. At some point, work on 2.4 needs to stop. Unless you'd like
> to see 2.5 dragged out another decade?
Is it realistic to enforce that 2.4.49 will be the final 2.4.x release
before we saw at least one 2.5.x release? Sounds really strange to me.
I never said it would absolutely be the last release. I said I would
really really really like it to be the last release. Please pay attention
to what is actually written. If there becomes enough reason to create
another 2.4.x release, then clearly one will have to be made. We did this
with 2.3 as well.
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: