Xin LI wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 11/03/11 17:10, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Tomorrow I'll be working on merging in libmdb/back-mdb. If anyone would like to do a basic sanity test against current RE24, that would be helpful. It has all of the planned fixes for 2.4.27 except ITS#7025 which Howard is still working on.
It seems that back-mdb really expects FDSYNC and fdatasync be available on target system. Currently FreeBSD does not have implemented these semantics (yet).
I've made a workaround in the FreeBSD port to make it work; it would be nice to have configure script test if FDSYNC and fdatasync is available and make the corresponding workaround (FSYNC and fsync) if not so building from source would just work.
You're welcome to submit appropriate patches for configure.in and any affected code.
Test shows test018-syncreplication-persist failed but I haven't took looked into it yet. Is this a known issue?
Works fine for me.
Cheers,
Xin LIdelphij@delphij.net https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOuHxvAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBq3EIALPHhihXLsIHMEOdv/bR2u8j 9TMqMA0RAs0osOX15PRhTN+JqOSWT9q9kABHenyRoFZHxN1QKmFqaKjsNz/aECKm H8SqaLrFzJwO0exUmiO40eMXncci6ZvBhyir1p4C/CqxWxk55jY4APqvt4okTfhL pvHUv3O6Gcuxaf29+ZKc2G/qfwcSVV7nfzv6DAzk7z5IHzndVOZ4uCo3nQuXAgxY ej6qRCBaOOe5WMu0wKjg5uquoPUyWZnBbJHOIcGpdRE9PXuSZ7z72z9l1y8BTxih MrnvN4VopHmLrkZoCzPACwNwm7fB73dqtAmNNKpd0e3YssOCnZmDgquhOWGWkWY= =onQu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----