8 Jun
2016
8 Jun
'16
2:55 p.m.
Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote:
I lost this thread (from May 19). Summarized in ITS#8435 plus a new suggestion: Revert sc_writewait and get it done with a field somewhere else, maintained by callbacks. Dunno if that's feasible.
There is no "somewhere else" to use.
I see no reason to revert the change. We can simply add sc_writewait to the end of the structure, which is the normal practice for adding new fields to existing structs.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/