22 Nov
2008
22 Nov
'08
1:52 a.m.
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Howard Chu wrote: ...
Something else came to mind. The trickle_task obviously cannot increase the overall volume of I/O, so there's no good reason for it to make things more than twice as slow.
Really? Why can't a DB page be modified, written out by memp_trickle(), modified again, and then written out by txn_checkpoint()?
Because we're talking about slapadd here, and it doesn't work that way.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/