Re: Performance improvements for set-based ACLs?
On 02/03/2014 10:12 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 07:48 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Yes, I know:
>> Set-based ACLs are slow even if one properly sets index configuration.
>>
>> But I'd like to raise a discussion here whether it would be possible to
improve
>> the performance within slapd.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
> What about profiling some use cases of interest?
I'm not sure what exactly you mean. Be assured that I'm already trying to
re-arrange the ACLs to make things faster. IMO I also defined decent indexing
configuration.
Or do you want to see some use-cases I've implemented?
I mean apply realistic
load to realistic set-based ACLs and profile the
execution, to track possible bottlenecks, to avoid spending time in
optimizing code that doesn't get used.
p.
--
Pierangelo Masarati
Associate Professor
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali
Politecnico di Milano