On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on
>> an idea
>> of Steve:
>> Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in
>> OpenLDAP's TODO.
>> In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in
>> and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for
>> purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in
> One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules...
> (server wide instead of subtree specfication wide).
So you're voting against the approach suggested above?
No. Above you say "without enforcing them". I suggest "with
as ditContentRules are (if instantiated).