Re: dITStructureRules/nameForms in subschema subentry for informational purpose

Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: > >> Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on >> an idea >> of Steve: >> >> Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in >> OpenLDAP's TODO. >> >> In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in >> slapd.conf >> and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for >> informational >> purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in >> slapd.conf. >> >> Opinions? > > One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules... > (server wide instead of subtree specfication wide). So you're voting against the approach suggested above?