On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote:
> ok... what's the number of writes being carried out in
> transaction? the original scenario in which i saw the issue was when
> there was one (!!). the design at the time was not optimised for
> batches of reads followed by batches of writes.
This is 1 write per txn.
already? oh ok so that's hammering the machine rather a lot, then :)
ok let me do some exploring this end, see if i can come up with
something that replicates the dreadful performance.