Re: cn=config: sharing, conditionals

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

Howard Chu wrote:

...

We'd also want these controls for syncrepl stanzas. (Too bad the patch to turn syncrepl into an overlay was never committed....)

Probably that was a good thing, instead, since that patch created a lot of overhead to allow slurpd logging as well (which was its original purpose, i.e. abstracting from the replication mechanism). It could be easily revitalized with only syncrepl in mind (and it would probably be beneficial to slapd anyway).

We should consider this for 2.5, I think.