30 Nov
2012
30 Nov
'12
7:35 a.m.
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Unfortunately, libmdb already exists in modern linux systems as part of the mdb-tools package. This would be a problematic conflict for getting MDB packaged in general. As a proposal, how about liblmdb as the new name? I haven't been able to find any instances of that existing in the wild.
This is basically a continuation of this thread http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201111/msg00063.html
I think liblmdb for the name of the library file is fine. Do we need to change any other instances of "mdb" as well, or can we just let them slide?
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/