Aaron Richton wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Michael Ströder wrote:
> This patch seems to fail now (see below). I'm inclined to remove it but I
> wonder whether it might be still needed/useful today.
This probably goes back to lines of thought (from Ralf, even) i.e.:
Thanks for digging out this.
In an age of nssov, nslcd, etc etc. the entire question is redefined.
like that probably causes more pain (either directly or by hiding issues) than
it helps. I'd drop it.
Dropped for now.